Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush regrets hurting U.S. diplomacy
rooters ^ | 1-13-04

Posted on 01/13/2005 5:47:28 PM PST by Indy Pendance

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush says he regrets sending the wrong impression of the United States by using phrases like "Bring 'em on" and "dead or alive" in his first term and has pledged to be more diplomatic.

In an interview with ABC's Barbara Walters to be broadcast on Friday, Bush said some of his past remarks were too blunt.

"'Bring it on,' was a little blunt," the president said in a transcript of the interview released on Thursday.

"I remember when I talked about Osama bin Laden, I said we're going to get him dead or alive. I guess it's not the most diplomatic of language," Bush said.

The president in July 2003 used the phrase "Bring 'em on" when speaking of insurgent attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq. The comment was widely interpreted as a challenge to the insurgents but Bush said his intent was to rally U.S. troops.

Days after the September 11, 2001, attacks, Bush said he wanted to catch Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," a phrase that reinforced the U.S. president's international image as a cowboy.

Bush said his wife, Laura, disapproved and "chewed me out right after that."

"So I do have to be cautious about, you know, conveying thoughts in a way maybe that doesn't send wrong impressions about our country," he said.

Asked about bin Laden, who remains at large, Bush reiterated his vow to "bring him to justice."

Bush's expressions of regret over his use of language contrasted with his comments at a news conference in April 2004, when he struggled for an answer to a reporter who asked him to name his biggest mistake since the September 11 attacks.

In another mea culpa, the president said he felt his administration had done a poor job bolstering its image in the Muslim world.

"Our public diplomacy efforts aren't ... very robust, and aren't very good, compared to the public diplomacy efforts of those who would like to spread hatred and ... and vilify the United States," Bush said.

But he said he thought U.S. efforts to aid victims of the December 26 Indian Ocean tsunami would help improve Washington's image abroad.

Turning to domestic politics, Bush played down expectations that his brother Jeb, who is governor of Florida, would someday run for president.

"I don't think he's interested in running," the president said.

In a separate interview in USA Today, Bush said he was concerned about the Education Department's decision to pay conservative commentator Armstrong Williams to promote his "No Child Left Behind" law, which sets accountability standards for U.S. public schools.

He said he wanted to prevent another such incident.

"There needs to be a clear distinction between journalism and advocacy," Bush said. "All of us, the Cabinet, needs to take a good look and make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bringiton; bush43; geopolitics; misunderestimate; ropeadope; strategery; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-328 next last
To: TASMANIANRED

live interview, heard the banshee herself talking about it earlier today


201 posted on 01/14/2005 2:35:32 PM PST by buckeye2159
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

"Bush used the phrase in July 2003 to say U.S. troops would not be scared off by Iraqi insurgents' attacks. During the presidential election campaign, his rival, Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, used the line to criticize administration policy. "If the White House wants to make this election about national security, I have three words they understand: 'Bring, it, on!' "

One of my biggest laughs came from deadpan ,deadman Kerry trying to rally his troops with that phrase..Lame.


202 posted on 01/14/2005 2:41:08 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Oh, for goodness' sake, get a grip! I didn't wish death on you. I was making fun of your saying you were twice my age in your (failed) attempt to belittle me.

If you are, you're 111 years old, you old coot.

And I didn't give you a single bit of marital advice. Go back and read it with your spectacles on.

I said I hope you don't have a wife (because you think that a man's valuing his wife's opinion makes him henpecked, and that's idiotic).

Now go back to your rocking chair, quit calling me names and saying stupid (and very wrong) things about me.

You assault people with your insults, but cry like a baby when anyone stands up to you. Is that the advice you give to your great-grandchildren when you try to teach them how to grow up and be mature adults?

203 posted on 01/14/2005 2:43:34 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Awestruck
What are you TALKING about?

Who said there was nothing wrong with this presidency? Who said he was perfect? Who said any of those things you just said?

Can you even read? Do you just make things up with everyone you talk to? Sheesh!

204 posted on 01/14/2005 2:45:35 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
I disagree that he's 'dead wrong.'

Anyone in public office needs to be careful of what he says. That's just plain obvious.

And, have you been in Europe or the Middle East lately? Do you seriously think that the enemy has not done a better job of getting their message of anti-American hatred out than we have the truth about us (remembering that our own press is anti-American)?

You think we can't do a better job of diplomacy anywhere? C'mon!

You guys are making something out of nothing here.

205 posted on 01/14/2005 2:49:27 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: foofoopowder
I agree. I loved it when he said "Bring it on" and I think most people did.

He knows we're at war, he knows the costs, and he's strong enough to keep up the fight no matter what anyone says.

I agree with whoever it was that said he was throwing a bone to the press here.

It's not an apology or retraction of anything, and certainly not a change in policy.

206 posted on 01/14/2005 2:54:25 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

We are upto our neck diplomacy. I have lived and travelled all over the world, including the Middle East. Here is something Bush should understand. The rest of the world understands power. They toed the Soviet line because of Soviet military and covert capabilities. This is the same reason why the world now sucks up to Islamic fundamentalism. No matter how diplomatic and how nice we become, that will not change how the rest of the world looks at us. This is sort of like the NYT syndrome. No matter how nice conservatives are, the TImes will never say one good thing about you. Bush needs to understand that the way we get respect in this world is pushing right back. Except, we are Americans and we should only use power to do things that are just and serve our best interest.


207 posted on 01/14/2005 3:20:50 PM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
OK..........I can agree with that and understand the parallel you gave.

I'll give you that quote as mistaken, but I'm not sure that it's being backed by any change in policy.

I think we're carrying a pretty big stick in the world right now, and with the switch from Colin Powell to Condi Rice, we're not going to get any softer, that's for sure.

208 posted on 01/14/2005 3:25:17 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

get a grip yourself.
the first lady has NO elected office.
got it dingy?


209 posted on 01/14/2005 3:39:41 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 ("He's NOT a human, he's a holy half-dead")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

I said I hope you don't have a wife (because you think that a man's valuing his wife's opinion makes him henpecked, and that's idiotic).



didn't say what I thought, only that the librarian background and being married to the pres does not qualify her to influence foreign policy which I doubt she does.

the drooling you demonstrate over the first family, is embarrasing.

I never said henpecked either.
stop lying about what I said and attributing thoughts to people who you OBVIOUSLY know nothing about. Pretending to be a mind reader is pathetic.

it's moronic.
Try and grow up before you pass out any more of your 'sage' advice, marital assessments and mind reading skills as authorative and expert analysis.

You sound like Dr. Laura, the fake "psychology" doctor, who is really only qualified to teach phys ed, but passes her self off as an expert on all kinds of malarkey.


210 posted on 01/14/2005 3:47:40 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 ("He's NOT a human, he's a holy half-dead")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
LOL!

Whatever you say, Bob. I was SO sure that the First Lady was elected.

Dang it! I hate being wrong about these complicated political things. I guess I should leave politics up to smart men like you and stop pretending I understand what it's all about.

And I guess Laura will have to stop talking to her husband for the next four years, so old cranks like you will stop calling her husband henpecked. I'll write her a letter tomorrow.....

btw, I haven't drooled for at least 54 years, and I'm quite sure that you drool far more than I. Most 111 year old men do.........hehe.

And give those great grandkids a hug for me, after you wipe away your tears from being treated so badly by a drooling, dingy, idiot, half your age, 'wet behind the ears soccer mom,' (did I miss anything??), OK? :o)

211 posted on 01/14/2005 3:53:01 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Oh, gee. I see I missed a whole bunch of insults from your last post.

Too bad, no time to post any more.

Have some fun, sweetie.......life is good. :o)

212 posted on 01/14/2005 3:54:24 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Don't you have someone to go henpeck?
Run along now.


213 posted on 01/14/2005 4:02:03 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 ("He's NOT a human, he's a holy half-dead")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
ah hell , Mr. President , I love the way you tell it like it is ! In fact I wish you would talk ,and act, about 5 x's tougher half the time . Don't let these wussies stage manage
you into any of that softened political correctness crapola.
The words you utter should send shivers of fear and apprehension up the spines of every living Jihadi , if ya ask me. The words you say should tweak the beak of every bleeding
heart Liberal that cares more about our enemies than they do about our own people and our troops.
Mr. President , I love your so-called Bushism's , you are the
best Prez that has come along since Teddy Roosevelt and God knows how history and America blessed that man.

The only thing I ask of you , is to do what you say .
Then let's get out there and kick the living crap out of our enemies and totally crush them into dust on the battlefield
and walk away heads held high in victory .
Anything less is un-American , imho.....
214 posted on 01/14/2005 4:23:41 PM PST by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
better than kerry the traitor by light years.
but letting the wife henpeck him over a choice of words that MANY of Americans approved of, is so, well, European.

Now WHO is a liar?? Not me, Bob.

If you want my REAL psychoanalysis of you, I'd say you're just jealous because you look lousy in a flightsuit.

(Please don't show me a picture though, whether I'm right or wrong......I might drool either way).

215 posted on 01/14/2005 4:38:35 PM PST by ohioWfan (W.........STILL the President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

read later...this don't sound good.


216 posted on 01/14/2005 4:43:03 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Thanks for pointing out where I thought you were making stuff up. You are clearly right there, and I was wrong.

Regardless, Laura needs to keep her mouth out of our foreign policy decisions.

I must also say, I seriously doubt your qualifications as a psychologist... but not as a psychotic.

Now, you can go drool over your flightsuit pictures... since somehow you think it helps you give out such quality marital advice.

roflmao.
bye bye


217 posted on 01/14/2005 4:45:08 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 ("He's NOT a human, he's a holy half-dead")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

You actually thought his comments were reckless (I'm assuming that's the word you meant to use) and conveyed the wrong impression?


218 posted on 01/14/2005 4:53:28 PM PST by ShadowDancer (Vivere est cogitare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

Pelosi: 'Having Admitted Error of His Words, President Must Admit Error of His Ways'
Fri Jan 14, 2:19 PM ET

To: National Desk

Contact: Brendan Daly or Jennifer Crider, 202-226-7616, both of the Office of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi

WASHINGTON, Jan. 14 /U.S. Newswire/ -- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on remarks by President Bush in an interview with regional newspapers yesterday in which he said he regretted saying "bring 'em on" in reference to insurgents in Iraq who wanted to attack our troops:

"The President has finally acknowledged that his taunting the Iraqi insurgents by saying 'bring 'em on' has had unintended consequences, likely increasing the dangers faced by our troops in Iraq. Although unintended, the consequences of such remarks were all too predictable.

"It was also predictable that creating a chaotic security situation in Iraq would make the country what it was not before the war -- a 'magnet for terrorists,' a result recently confirmed by the National Intelligence Council.

"More than two years ago, senior military experts such as General Eric Shinseki warned against sending too small a force to Iraq, in part because they knew that any security vacuum created by the fall of Saddam Hussein would be filled by elements united only by the desire to kill Americans. One of the many mistakes of the Iraq war is that the President did not have a plan for preventing Iraq from becoming a hotbed for terrorists. We will be paying the price of that mistake for years to come.

"Having admitted the error of his words, the President must admit the error of his ways."



W needs to stop shooting himself in the foot over stuff that he has done right. This is where his listening to laura got him? Apologizing for threatening the bad guys is a good thing?

Preposterous, and disheartening to some of our family members in the military.
very very disappointing.


219 posted on 01/14/2005 4:53:58 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2 ("He's NOT a human, he's a holy half-dead")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
btw, I was commenting on the ARTICLE. Sorry for thinking that was what we were supposed to do on FR. I didn't know that it was to only comment on what ShadowDancer thinks.

If you're replying to me, it might be helpful to discuss what I've said, not what someone else said that I never even mentioned. Just a thought.

220 posted on 01/14/2005 4:55:38 PM PST by ShadowDancer (Vivere est cogitare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson