Skip to comments.
US military wanted 'sex bomb'
Herald Sun ^
| January 14, 2005
| By Milanda Rout
Posted on 01/13/2005 4:25:35 PM PST by Eurotwit
A "SEX bomb" that would make enemy soldiers irresistible to each other was considered by the US military.
Declassified documents reveal the Pentagon toyed with the idea of an aphrodisiac chemical weapon in 1994.
The gas would have made enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. The weapon's developers said homosexual behaviour among troops would deal a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale.
The plans, unearthed from a US air force laboratory in Ohio, were published in New Scientist magazine.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: callingartbell; miltech; sex; sexbomb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
After clandestine trials in San Fransisco the project was apparently abandoned.
1
posted on
01/13/2005 4:25:35 PM PST
by
Eurotwit
To: Eurotwit
1994. During the Toon admin. Figgers.
2
posted on
01/13/2005 4:26:12 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: mewzilla
If that was Clinton's Idea he is a genius!
3
posted on
01/13/2005 4:27:48 PM PST
by
IronMan04
To: Eurotwit
This wouldn't embarass muslim armies at all.
4
posted on
01/13/2005 4:28:06 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
To: Eurotwit
Deemed an abject failure against the French military and their life partners.
5
posted on
01/13/2005 4:28:42 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: Eurotwit
For the Iraqi army, this would be totally unnecessary.
6
posted on
01/13/2005 4:29:00 PM PST
by
Spok
To: Eurotwit
Ha. HAHhuhh..HA!HAAAA!
LMAO!
...
*snicker*
7
posted on
01/13/2005 4:29:07 PM PST
by
Tarpaulin
(Look it up.)
To: Eurotwit
But for the love of God, DON'T PUT PANTIES ON THEIR HEADS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: Eurotwit
So that explains Clinton and Monica (and all the rest) maybe? Hah!
9
posted on
01/13/2005 4:29:16 PM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: Eurotwit
New meaning to the old adage, "Make love not war"....
10
posted on
01/13/2005 4:29:45 PM PST
by
cynicom
(<p)
To: IronMan04
Clintigula a genius? LOL. Well, I guess that's one word for it :)
11
posted on
01/13/2005 4:29:47 PM PST
by
mewzilla
(Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
To: Eurotwit

"Clinton desired to see if it would work on female personnel - preferably between 180 and 200 pounds"
12
posted on
01/13/2005 4:29:51 PM PST
by
KMC1
To: Eurotwit
I don't believe this, for the simple reason that no one can predict what the effect of creating widespread homosexual attraction among enemy troops would have on the enemy's fighting capabilities.
To: Eurotwit
the kittens came up with the same idea.
14
posted on
01/13/2005 4:31:17 PM PST
by
postaldave
(ACLU = Anti-Christian, Liberal, and Un-American.)
To: Eurotwit
I want the household version! ;)
15
posted on
01/13/2005 4:31:24 PM PST
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: Eurotwit
16
posted on
01/13/2005 4:31:35 PM PST
by
ProudVet77
(If it's Saturday, I'm sailing!)
To: Eurotwit
Are you sure San Fransicko was the only trial?
17
posted on
01/13/2005 4:31:46 PM PST
by
SwinneySwitch
(America, bless God.)
To: Eurotwit
Need to drop this on Enrique Iglesias so I can get my girl back.
To: independentmind
I don't believe this, for the simple reason that no one can predict what the effect of creating widespread homosexual attraction among enemy troops would have on the enemy's fighting capabilities. Just go to a moveon.org meeting and observe.
19
posted on
01/13/2005 4:32:22 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Eurotwit
Dubbed "Don't ask, don't smell.".......
20
posted on
01/13/2005 4:32:23 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson