[HenryLeeII]

The problem with personal coup de tats is that they can easily be abused. In the future more and more people (me being one of them hopefully, straight to God's ear) will acumulate more and more wealth. Which is a good thing. The problem is that some of those people will be like Soros, who in my opinion has launched several coup attempts in Eastern Europe...

And governments quite often abuse their citizens. But, with a personally-financed coup, there is a much shorter chain of command to go through to get results. If Coup Dictator A doesn't improve conditions quickly enough, then along comes Coup Dictator B to fire him and take over. This is what I mean by a democratization of the governance process. No elections to mess with, no pleading to one's representatives for change, etc. Simply remove A, install B, and get on with it.

[kipita]

This is what I mean by a democratization of the governance process. No elections to mess with, no pleading to one's representatives for change, etc. Simply remove A, install B, and get on with it.

Then oceans of blood would be an understatement?