To: Lijahsbubbe; SF Republican; pickemuphere
The malicious lie that Prince Harry is not Prince Charles's son has been refuted so many times (including by James Hewitt himself) that it is pathetic to see it being perpetuated. Princess Diana did not meet James Hewitt until after Prince Harry was born. End of discussion.
To: royalcello
The malicious lie that Prince Harry is not Prince Charles's son has been refuted so many times (including by James Hewitt himself) that it is pathetic to see it being perpetuated.Yeah, right. See post 109. That's about all the proof I need that Charles was cuckolded by Jimmy Hewitt.
To: royalcello
Yes, I've heard that Diana did not meet Hewitt until after Harry was born. Do you really think anyone would admit that a sitting princess had a child with another man?
She cheated on Charles, Charles cheated on her, the rest of the family is looney. I don't put anything past them. They're not exactly pillars of virtue, to say the least.
Plus, the biggest factor, he looks exactly like Hewitt.
To: royalcello
You're correct. NO possibility at all.
![](http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38269000/jpg/_38269492_hewitt300.jpg)
![](http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/ilove/royalty/gallery/340/charles_photo.jpg)
166 posted on
01/13/2005 8:51:44 PM PST by
onyx
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson