Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lijahsbubbe; SF Republican; pickemuphere
The malicious lie that Prince Harry is not Prince Charles's son has been refuted so many times (including by James Hewitt himself) that it is pathetic to see it being perpetuated. Princess Diana did not meet James Hewitt until after Prince Harry was born. End of discussion.
126 posted on 01/13/2005 12:07:48 PM PST by royalcello
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: royalcello
The malicious lie that Prince Harry is not Prince Charles's son has been refuted so many times (including by James Hewitt himself) that it is pathetic to see it being perpetuated.

Yeah, right. See post 109. That's about all the proof I need that Charles was cuckolded by Jimmy Hewitt.

151 posted on 01/13/2005 1:18:24 PM PST by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: royalcello

Yes, I've heard that Diana did not meet Hewitt until after Harry was born. Do you really think anyone would admit that a sitting princess had a child with another man?

She cheated on Charles, Charles cheated on her, the rest of the family is looney. I don't put anything past them. They're not exactly pillars of virtue, to say the least.

Plus, the biggest factor, he looks exactly like Hewitt.


165 posted on 01/13/2005 8:44:51 PM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: royalcello
You're correct. NO possibility at all.


166 posted on 01/13/2005 8:51:44 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson