[Shethink13]

No interpretation needed - the Duelfer Report in summary is that since 1991 Saddam NO LONGER had WMDs BUT anticipated having them in the future.

Nope. The report never said that. We're going in circles because that's my original argument with you. Of course you don't need an interpretation when you're perfectly happy accepting the interpretation of the AP.

I've cited specific language in the report itself, you've cited one or two lines and twisted the content to suit your agenda, whatever it is.

I now leave it to the other readers to decide who has the better argument. I'm tired of repeating myself.

[Destro]

THE REPORT SAID EXACTLY THAT! I EVEN LINKED THE PAGE!!

At this webaddress http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/chap5.html

You will find these words:

"While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter"