Posted on 01/12/2005 9:16:11 AM PST by MIT-Elephant
On Monday, CBS News fired four senior officials in the wake of an independent report related to the airing of a 60 Minutes piece in September about President George W. Bushs Vietnam-era National Guard service. This is a good, necessary and appropriate step in ensuring that the news the public receives from unbiased news sources is just that fair and unbiased.
The sad part is that this administration cannot seem to take similar steps to root out the causes of misinformation and immorality.
In September, CBS got a tip that Bush had gotten into the National Guard only because of preferential treatment. To start with, this was not a new claim.
In his fathers 1988 campaign, Junior, then a consultant to the campaign, publicly defended his fathers running mate, Dan Quayle, from accusations that he had received preferential treatment in joining the National Guard during Vietnam.
This brought media attention to Juniors record and accusations that he too had gained admittance to the guard using undue family influence.
While there are probably only a handful of people who definitively know how the president came to protect the Texas coast during Vietnam for the record, there was no known attack on Texas by the Vietnamese during the 1970s, or ever for that matter a look at the circumstances surrounding juniors enlistment in the National Guard leaves little doubt that somewhere, by someone, strings were pulled.
Fact: The nationwide waiting list for enlistment in the various National Guard units at the time was 100,000 people. Fact: There were waiting lists for the Texas National Guard. Fact: At the time Junior applied for enlistment, his eventual unit had its full complement of pilots, 27 on active duty and two in training.
So the ambiguity surrounding juniors entrance into the Texas National Guard is nothing new, and it is true that CBS rushed the story to the air, did not check its facts and did a poor job of proving what I just did in three paragraphs.
Fine.
To loosely paraphrase the Bible, the Bush administration ought to judge the acts that it has perpetrated and overseen before judging the acts of others.
Abu Ghraib:
Who got fired for this? A few low- level privates and specialists are currently on trial for torturing Iraqi prisoners, but you mean to tell me thats all?
Congress months ago, in closed sessions, saw pictures and videotapes of prisoners being tortured, raped and in some instances killed by the Army of the United States of America.
This is incomprehensible. Arent we fighting this war on terror so that we can live in a world free from senseless violence against defenseless individuals?
Weapons of mass destruction.
True, George Tenet did lose his job for this one, but many months after the fact. Not once has the Bush administration admitted that it based its claims to the American people on documents it could not authenticate. In reality, the parallels to the CBS debacle resound.
Yellow cake from Africa? We know where the weapons are, Donald Rumsfeld assured us on Meet the Press. Theyre in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad. Dick Cheney went so far as to claim that Iraq had restarted its nuclear program.
Its almost two years later and, well, you know the story. No weapons. No nuclear centrifuges.
No resignations.
But hey, Iraqs a big place, and Im sure theyre still there somewhere.
The Bush administration rushed to the airways with their unauthenticated story as fast as CBS did. As a result, more than a thousand Americans have lost their lives.
What happened in the wake of the CBS story? Well, Bush won reelection and four people lost their jobs. You decide which is the larger travesty.
Information concerning juniors service in the Texas National Guard was gleaned from J.H. Hatfields biography "Fortunate Son." For more information on the history of this fortunate son, e-mail Nick at ndfram@stanford.edu.
"While there are probably only a handful of people who definitively know how the president came to protect the Texas coast during Vietnam for the record, there was no known attack on Texas by the Vietnamese during the 1970s, or ever for that matter a look at the circumstances surrounding juniors enlistment in the National Guard leaves little doubt that somewhere, by someone, strings were pulled."
First, he doesn't distinguish between the Air and Army national guards - an important disctintion. Second, AirNG had important patrol duty during the Cold War (especially with Cuba nearby), and in my understanding was not a dogfighting unit. His dismissal of the National Guard smears all ANGers (and even questions their patriotism - for real!)
"To loosely paraphrase the Bible, the Bush administration ought to judge the acts that it has perpetrated and overseen before judging the acts of others."
The Bush administration had nothing to do with the CBS report. Bush wouldn't have let Justice touch the case even if they wanted to. This sounds like more conspiracy theory that links Bush to every right-of-center group.
Oh, I forgot to mention...FreeRepublic was cited in an oped in yesterday's Daily. A guy was mad that we'd posted his column and ripped it to shreds.
http://daily.stanford.edu/tempo?page=content&id=15587&repository=0001_article
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the heading. Thanks.
Not for pilots.
"Bush's stint in Guard scrutinized": REBUTTAL TO TODAY'S WASHINGTON POST HIT PIECE
Dallas Morning News | July 4, 1999 | Pete Slover, George Kuempel
Posted on 02/03/2004 5:24:49 PM EST by MikeA
With the Vietnam War raging, 21-year-old George W. Bush wanted to join the Texas Air National Guard in 1968. He offered no aviation experience but cited his work as a ranch hand, oil field "roustabout" and sporting goods salesman.
He passed the written test required for pilot trainees. Among the results: He showed below-average potential as a would-be flier but scored high as a future leader.
Although Mr. Bush's unit in Texas had a waiting list for many spots, he was accepted because he was one of a handful of applicants willing and qualified to spend more than a year in active training, and extra shifts after training, flying single-seat F-102 fighter jets.
Once he was in, Guard officials sought to capitalize on his standing as the son of a congressman.
A 1970 Guard news release featured Mr. Bush as "one member of our younger generation who doesn't get his kicks from pot or hashish or speed.
"On, he gets high, all right, but not from narcotics," it said.
"Fighters are it," Mr. Bush is quoted as saying. "I've always wanted to be a fighter pilot, and I wouldn't want to fly anything else."
Such are the details that emerge from a review of Mr. Bush's service record by The Dallas Morning News, along with interviews with Guard leaders, former colleagues and state officials familiar with that unit.
Mr. Bush, 52, now the Republican front-runner for president, has repeatedly denied suggestions by political rivals that he received preferential treatment to get into the Guard - widely seen as a haven from which enlistees were unlikely to be shipped to Vietnam.
As evidence he wasn't dodging combat, Mr. Bush has pointed to his efforts to try to volunteer for a program that rotated Guard pilots to Vietnam, although he wasn't called.
"There was no special treatment," he said.
Mr. Bush said he took flying seriously. "You will die in your airplane if you didn't practice, and I wasn't interested in dying," he said.
Records provided to The News by Tom Hail, a historian for the Texas Air National Guard, show that the unit Mr. Bush signed up for was not filled. In mid-1968, the 147th Fighter Interceptor Group, based in Houston, had 156 openings among its authorized staff of 925 military personnel.
Of those, 26 openings were for officer slots, such as that filled by Mr. Bush, and 130 were for enlisted men and women. Also, several former Air Force pilots who served in the unit said that they were recruited from elsewhere to fly for the Texas Guard.
Officers who supervised Mr. Bush and approved his admission to the Guard said they were never contacted by anyone on Mr. Bush's behalf.
"He didn't have any strings pulled, because there weren't any strings to pull," said Leroy Thompson of Brownwood, who commanded the squadron that kept the waiting list for the guard at Ellington Air Force Base. "Our practices were under incredible scrutiny then. It was a very ticklish time."
Fellow members of the Bush unit said they knew of his background.
U.S. Rep. George Bush was at his son's side when he was made an officer in the Guard. The elder Mr. Bush, a former World War II pilot, later spoke at his son's graduation from flight school.
David Hanifl of La Crescent, Minn., an Air Force regular who went through pilot training in Georgia with George W. Bush, said the flight instructors were eager to fly with the Texan.
"He didn't get any preferential treatment, but some of the instructors liked the idea of scheduling him to fly with them because of his connections," he said.
Mr. Hanifl said it was somewhat unusual for a Guardsman to be included in the flight class with Air Force regulars.
"You had to have clout to get that type of assignment," he said. He added that Mr. Bush was a good pilot and did not seek any favors.
Also getting into the Bush unit in 1968 was Lloyd Bentsen III, a recent graduate of Stanford University business school whose father was a former congressman later elected Democratic U.S. senator from Texas.
The waiting list
According to several former officers, the openings in the unit were filled from a waiting list kept in the base safe of Rufus G. Martin, then an Air National Guard personnel officer.
In a recent interview, Mr. Martin of San Antonio said the list was kept on computer and in a bound volume, which was periodically inspected by outside agencies to make sure the list was kept properly.
Mr. Bush said he sought the Guard position on his own, before graduating from Yale University in 1968. He personally met with Col. Walter B. Staudt, commander of the 147th group.
In an interview, Mr. Bush said he walked into Col. Staudt's Houston office and told him he wanted to be a fighter pilot.
"He told me they were looking for pilots," Mr. Bush said. He said he was told that there were five or six flying slots available, and he got one of them.
While Guard slots generally were coveted, pilot positions required superior education, physical fitness and the willingness to spend more than a year in full-time training.
"If somebody like that came along, you'd snatch them up," said the former commander, who retired as a general. "He took no advantage. It wouldn't have made any difference whether his daddy was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff."
Bobby Hodges, the group's operations officer, and others familiar with Guard rules said Mr. Bush made it to the top of the short list of candidates who could pass both the written officer test and a rigorous flight physical to qualify for the three to four annual pilot training "quotas" allotted to the unit.
Mr. Hodges and Gen. Staudt are the two surviving members of the military panel that reviewed and approved Mr. Bush's officer commission.
Most of those wanting to get into the Guard at that time, they said, didn't want to put in the full year of active service that was required to become a pilot.
Pilot aptitude test
Records from his military file show that in January 1968, after inquiring about Guard admission, Mr. Bush went to an Air Force recruiting office near Yale, where he took and passed the test required by the Air Force for pilot trainees. His score on the pilot aptitude section, one of five on the test, was in the 25th percentile, the lowest allowed for would-be fliers.
Ralph J. Ianuzzi, a newly minted Air Force captain, supervised administration of the test and signed Mr. Bush's score sheet, an event of which he had no recollection.
The pilot portion of the exam included tasks such as identifying the angle of a plane in flight after being shown the view from the cockpit and figuring out which way a gear in a machine would turn in response to another gear's being turned.
"That score for pilot seems low. I made that, and I'm dyslexic," Mr. Ianuzzi, a retired FBI agent who never earned his wings but said it was significant that Mr. Bush did. "He passed the most important test. He flew the plane."
On the "officer quality section," designed to measure intangible traits such as leadership, Mr. Bush scored better than 95 percent of those taking the test.
It's impossible to compare Mr. Bush's score on the test to scores of other pilot candidates, because Air Force historians say no records survive of average scores for those accepted to pilot training.
Pilot training
After completing basic training in San Antonio in August 1968, he helped out aircraft mechanics at Ellington until that November, when a pilot-training slot came open.
He was promoted to second lieutenant and began a 13-month pilot training program at Moody Air Force Base, in Georgia.
He was the only Guardsman among the 70 or so officers from other branches of the military who began the training.
Under the terms of his contract with the military, if Mr. Bush had failed to complete pilot school, he would have been required to serve the Guard in some other capacity, to enter the draft, or to enlist in another branch of the military.
After passing flight training, Mr. Bush was schooled for several more months at Ellington, and in March 1970 began flying "alerts," the name used to describe the 147th's mission of guarding gulf coast borders against foreign attack.
In those days, just five years after the Cuban missile crisis, the 147th kept at least two fighters ready to scramble, round-the-clock, guarding Texas oil fields and refineries against airstrikes.
"It's kind of a non-threatening way to do your military, get paid well for some long shifts, and feel good about your own involvement," said Douglas W. Solberg, now an airline pilot, offering his reasons for joining the 147th and serving with Mr. Bush after an Air Force flying stint. "It was a cushy way to be a patriot."
A former non-commissioned officer who worked on planes and supervised other ground crews at Ellington said Mr. Bush was not a silver-spoon snob or elitist, unlike some former Air Force fliers.
"I remember him coming down, kicking the tires, washing the windows, whatever," said Joe H. Briggs, now of Houston. "I'm probably one of the few people around who'll admit I voted for Clinton. But I'll pull for this guy for president."
No overseas duty
Mr. Bush's application for the Guard included a box to be checked specifying whether he did or did not volunteer for overseas duty. His includes a check mark in the box not wanting to volunteer for such an assignment.
But several personnel officers said that part of the application for domestic Guard units routinely would be filled out that way by a clerk typist, then given to the applicant to sign.
Mr. Bush has said that he signed up for but lacked the number of flying hours to participate in a program called the Palace Alert, which eventually rotated nine pilots from his unit into duty in Southeast Asia from 1969 to 1970.
His signup and willingness to participate was confirmed by several of his colleagues and superiors, who remembered the effort as brash but admirable.
"The more experienced pilots were shaking their heads, saying, "He doesn't even know where to park the planes,' " said Albert C. Lloyd, then head of personnel for the Texas Air National Guard.
Some attention has also focused on Mr. Bush's departure from the service. Under his original oath, he was obligated to serve in the Guard until May 1974. Instead, he was allowed to leave in October 1973 to attend Harvard Business School.
Former Guard officials and members of Mr. Bush's unit said that release, seven months early, was not unusual for the Guard. Mr. Bush's unit was changing airplanes at the time, from the single-seat F-102 to the dual-seat F-101. They said it made little sense to retrain him for just a few months' service, and letting him go freed spots for the Guard to recruit F-101 pilots from the Air Force and elsewhere.
ROFLMAO. Never mind.
He seems to confuse the Coast Guard with the National Guard. Man, this guys astute!
I know the election is over. But the hypocracy of the democracts and liberal media is beyond belief anymore. They have lost touch with reality.
Don't you just love these guys who spout-off about Guard service as if they knew anything at all about it?
Who gives a big, stinkin' pile?
This line of attack sure helped the left beat Bush in the last two national elections. I think the best thing we can do for this lefty living in the past is not interrupt him - he may move to current events and start creating news.
Wednesday May 12, 1999
Remembering Stanford
By Phillip Taubman
PALO ALTO -- Stanford University is tranquil this spring, graced by the brilliant sunshine and eucalyptus fragrance that help give the campus its distinctive California accent. Long gone are the sights and sounds of my undergraduate days three decades ago -- windows shattering in the night, tear-gas canisters exploding, the president's office in flames.
So it was with considerable curiosity that I returned to campus last weekend to attend a reunion of the anti-war movement that did so much to transform Stanford into a political battleground in the late 1960's. What, I wondered, had become of the students who spent their college years resisting the war in Vietnam and Stanford's links to it? What, if any, vestiges of the movement could be found on campus today?
A weekend gathering of 100 or so people can only begin to provide answers, but what I found was not entirely what I expected. Perhaps most of the investment bankers, venture capitalists and Silicon Valley millionaires stayed home, but by and large the men and women who attended the reunion were engaged in work directly connected to the values they had embraced in opposing the war. There were labor organizers, environmental activists, public health specialists, teachers and urban affairs experts. But the discourse seemed stale, as though a time capsule sealed in 1969 had been opened and the political tracts in it applied to the world today.
Needless to say, this was not a standard college reunion. Instead of red Stanford banners and tailgate picnics, there were faded manifestoes and impassioned arguments about American foreign policy. No one from the university showed up to solicit donations, which was just as well, since more than a few participants had devoted so much time to protesting that they never completed their undergraduate requirements. One person reported that he had finally graduated in 1984. I collected my diploma a year late because of hours spent covering demonstrations for The Stanford Daily.
Current students scarcely noticed the reunion, which was understandable on a sparkling May weekend that was ideal for going to the beach, hiking in the foothills or starting a new Internet company, which seems to be a favorite campus activity.
The reunion marked roughly the 30th anniversary of the largest, gentlest and most thoughtful anti-war action at Stanford in the 1960's. It was the nine-day occupation in April 1969 of the Applied Electronics Laboratory, a center for classified, military-related research.
No one knew it at the time, but the peaceful protest, supported by hundreds of students and many faculty members, was the high-water mark of nonviolent civil disobedience at the university. A few weeks later students ransacked an administration building and police were summoned to clear it, beginning a destructive spiral of violence that convulsed Stanford for several years.
It is clearly hard for today's students to fathom the passions and political action that were unleashed by the Vietnam War and the draft. The biggest cause at Stanford this spring was an effort by students at Berkeley to save an ethnic studies program that the University of California was threatening to disband.
Several students who addressed the reunion talked about the difficulty of rallying support for any cause. "Oh, I could do so much with 20 people," sighed Sarah Faye McMullen, after one 60's alumnus recalled the disappointment when only 20 students showed up for an early Vietnam protest. All five of the undergraduate panelists were women, and they pointedly complained about how few men are involved in political activities. I'm not sure they fully believed another former protester who declared, "We thought we were going to change the world."
His words reminded me of the deadly serious essay I wrote for Life magazine as a student, condemning my parents' generation for producing a materialistic, morally bankrupt world my classmates and I would have to fix. My father, a good-humored man, was restrained in his response.
Much of the weekend was devoted to discussion of the war in Yugoslavia, starting with a fiery denunciation of the NATO air strikes by Marjorie Cohn. She was an anti-war leader in 1969 and is now a professor at the Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego. She attacked the Balkan war as another case of American imperialism, saying the United States "will protect its markets and international influence at the expense of whatever small country happens to get in the way." She barely mentioned the brutal Serbian assault on Kosovo.
I liked Marjorie when we were fellow students, and admired her sense of compassion and fair play. But as she wound through her peroration, ending with "Power to the People!" I thought I had entered a time warp. I was surprised at how many of our contemporaries agreed with her. What saddened me was not the opposition to the NATO air war, though I disagree, but the hollowness of the critique. Surely those who courageously opposed the Vietnam War can do better today than align themselves with Serbia.
In September, CBS got a tip that Bush had gotten into the National Guard only because of preferential treatment. To start with, this was not a new claim.
To end with, it's not a true claim, either.
What a blatantly dishonest article! The reason CBS got into trouble is because the were biased and wanted to believe pie-in-the-sky lies in order to "get Bush" and they called the Kerry campaign right before they aired the hit piece. This article is sophomoric.
And we're supposed to take his rant seriously even though he can't get his facts right?
Sheesh, the sloppiness of these hack-jobs is absolutely stunning. Will they never learn?
Lets hope not! /grin
"how the president came to protect the Texas coast during Vietnam for the record, there was no known attack on Texas by the Vietnamese during the 1970s"
For the record, you are an idiot. Bush squadron was assigned bomber interdiction missions VS the Soviets along the Gulf.
As you can guess, the Daily is not exactly a hotbed of balanced (let alone fair) reporting and opinion.
Problem is, these attitudes will bubble out to the LameStream Media when these morons graduate.
>>
"how the president came to protect the Texas coast during Vietnam for the record, there was no known attack on Texas by the Vietnamese during the 1970s"
For the record, you are an idiot. Bush squadron was assigned bomber interdiction missions VS the Soviets along the Gulf.
<<
I wouldn't have posted the article, another badly done hatchet job, if not for that line. His casual dismissal of the Air National Guard makes me think he didn't learn about the Cold War in high school. Or the Cuban Missile Crisis.
The left's seething hatred of the military is put away only when they attack people for not putting themselves in enough danger. GW Bush - an Ivy grad, son of a Senator - shouldn't have been a private sent to Vietnam. He got in the right track, which was to use his education and leadership to become an officer. Those people don't come along every day.
>>I got this far before I puked:
In September, CBS got a tip that Bush had gotten into the National Guard only because of preferential treatment. To start with, this was not a new claim.
To end with, it's not a true claim, either.<<
And he doesn't even represent the CBS 'report' accurately.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.