Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz
Yes, but why call Lindsey when the papers were in the custody of the archives? Inquiring minds want to know.

The article kcvl just posted says that Lindsey was Clinton's liaison to the National Archives. Now what would be the point of calling Lindsey to tell him Berger had taken some stuff? Why not call Berger? Or (silly me) the FBI?

40 posted on 01/12/2005 1:44:40 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple

Why did the Archives call Lindsey? Apparently, the Archives wants us it think was b/c they had previous contact with Lindsey, but that does not preclude your theory that there was collusion, and the call may even be evidence of it.


44 posted on 01/12/2005 1:58:20 AM PST by Liz (Wise men are instructed by reason; lesser men, by experience; the ignorant, by necessity. Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

Berger was not in government at that time, so why was he allowed access to classified documents???


111 posted on 01/12/2005 6:26:57 AM PST by jwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Miss Marple

Call Lindsey to get the stuff back before anyone else knew. Not Berger because they thought he was a flake?


138 posted on 01/12/2005 7:13:27 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson