Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"ILLEGAL ALIEN QUESTIONED IN CHANDRA LEVY CASE." (From 2002)
TownHall.com ^ | June 5, 2002 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 01/11/2005 4:36:32 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell

Did you miss that headline in the news last week? Well, that's because no one ran it.

Ingmar Guandique, a violent Salvadoran national who is serving a 10-year sentence for assaulting two female joggers in Washington's Rock Creek Park last year, was interrogated recently as part of the investigation into the intern murder mystery. But in my review of all 115 news items archived in the Lexis-Nexis database that mention Guandique in connection with the Levy case, not a single story referred to his status as a criminal illegal alien.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; condidit; condit; dunne; levy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: LauraleeBraswell
I said before Condit voted for the impeachment of Clinton

He did not vote for impeachment. There were Four Articles voted on in the House and Condit voted "Nay" on each and every one.

I must ask why you are posting such disinformatoin and to what purpose?

21 posted on 01/11/2005 6:52:56 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom; LauraleeBraswell
You were given disinformation. Condit did not vote for impeachment.

Just setting the record straight.

22 posted on 01/11/2005 6:54:10 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper



Impeachment inquiry, sorry. Still, on other issues he sided Conservative.


23 posted on 01/11/2005 6:58:21 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom


http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/08/31/condit.redistricting/


24 posted on 01/11/2005 7:00:42 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0711-04.htm


25 posted on 01/11/2005 7:01:32 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell



http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23741

The Democrats HATED him...


26 posted on 01/11/2005 7:02:40 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper


Fox News
7th paragraph from Bottom

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,28021,00.html


27 posted on 01/11/2005 7:04:28 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell


Funny, I was replying to you on the other thread.
I cannot stand misinformation too.

I would like to say that I firmly believe the Democratic party's leadership was out to sink Condit. And this siduation was so conveinent.


28 posted on 01/11/2005 7:12:54 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
That Fox article is wrong.

First Article; Condit NAY

Second Article; Condit NAY

Third Article; Condit NAY

Fourth Article; Condit NAY

29 posted on 01/11/2005 7:20:53 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

And your point is...?????????


30 posted on 01/11/2005 7:21:50 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

What "other issues" and what does that have to do with anything?

I addressed a specific point of disinformation that you have taken upon yourself to spread hither and yon.

How he ranked on the "other issues" is completely irrelevant.


31 posted on 01/11/2005 7:27:38 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
But, I said before Condit voted for the impeachment of Clinton and often sided with Republican policies. He was a Democrat in name only.

Condit was replaced by Cardoza who is a member of the "Blue Dog Coalition", a group of 35 Democrats who are Conservative, so there probably isn't much change there. 31 Democrat Congressmen voted for impeachment along with Republicans, why would Condit be singled out?

32 posted on 01/11/2005 7:42:33 PM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: visualops
"Seemed to me the consensus was simply he is a scummy guy who deserved whatever treatment he got."

You must be talking about a congressman, right?

33 posted on 01/11/2005 7:56:41 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The Lord has given us President Bush; let's now turn this nation back to him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper


No, it is relevent. And you asked me where I got my source of information. I gave it to, FOX news, it's right there.


34 posted on 01/11/2005 8:51:02 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (“"Hi, I'm Richard Gere and I'm speaking for the entire world.” -Richard Gere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

The "Democrats" got rid of Condit because he was revealed to be a serial sexual abuser whose defense that it was a matter only of ministering to the needs of emotionally-arrested young women and/or was simply the strictly private matter of private consensual sex between adults did not wash with the party of ..... um ..... the Cli'tons.


35 posted on 01/11/2005 8:51:53 PM PST by Brian Allen (Who is Bub Woollice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherSavage; LauraleeBraswell; All


36 posted on 01/12/2005 12:13:52 AM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
The reason the Democrats dumped Condit was not because of any perceived disloyalty- it was because polling during the summer of 2001 showed he was bringing the party down. The public saw him as the face of the Democrats and it wasn't pretty.

As far as Condit's allegedly being a "conservative" Democrat, don't buy the hype. Condit did what it took to get elected, but he was a politician through-and through. He was thick as thieves with gray Davis, and before they both fell from grace, Davis was setting Condit up to be the next governor.

As far as clearing Condit of the Levy murder, that is ridiculous. There is no reason to move his name from the suspect list and every reason to keep him there. There may never be enough evidence to charge anyone in this crime, but it doesn't mean someone isn't guilty. I have never heared anything publicly that exculpated Condit, and I think that such information would have leaked.

No doubt, Guandique is the poster child for immigration reform, but that doesn't mean he murdered Chandra Levy. He passed a lie detector tests that sought to determine if he was involved in her murder. And as far as I know, the circumstances of her murder didn't match his M.O.

37 posted on 01/12/2005 12:34:49 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
That is a left wing publication that sought to portray Condit as a conservative because at the time he was suspected of murder, and one of the most unpopular men in the country. You are buying into left wing propaganda.

I live in California. Before Chandra Levy disappeared the Democrats did not have any grudge against Condit. In fact, he was the closest politician in the whole state to the highest-ranking Democrat in the state, Gray Davis. He was Davis' boy, and he was viewed as having a sky-is-the-limit future. For most of the summer elected Democrats were defending him, including Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein. But by the end of the summer, he was hurting the party nationally. Even then they didn't attack him, they just let him wither away.

38 posted on 01/12/2005 12:48:09 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson