Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quadrant
Uh, so? I'm not sure of the relevancy of your point. That's pretty undisputed.

The primary reason that the southern states voted for secession was because they saw Lincoln as anti-slavery. Though he knew he did not have the legal power as of 1861 to eliminate slavery altogether, many southernors believed that by barring slavery in the territories, the anti-slavery states would be joined by the new anti-slavery territories when they became states, thus giving the anti-slavery forces enough political power to legally ban slavery everywhere. Lincoln was a symbol of the increasing political power of anti-slavery forces.

Plus, the rising anti-slavery tide in the North and presumably in the new territories would provide a progressively more welcoming escape route for southern slaves, since many northern states were turning a blind eye to recapturing slaves.

The south saw the handwriting on the wall on slavery, and seceded.

86 posted on 01/11/2005 2:04:33 PM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: XJarhead
Secession was the rash and foolish act of political extremists who played right into Lincoln's hands.

Despite declining political power, the South still possessed enough strength the block any effort to emancipate the slaves via constitutional amendment.

If the South had not seceded, it might have been the Twentieth Century before slavery could have been abolished.
87 posted on 01/11/2005 2:33:19 PM PST by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: XJarhead

In his inaugural address, lincoln the war criminal stated that he had no intention of touching slavery.


88 posted on 01/11/2005 2:36:30 PM PST by rebelyell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson