[DaisyCutter]

Soundpolitics.com had some info that the ballots would have been bulk mailed, and therefore no postmark... however, there would have been records of the mailing at the post office and they've posted an email from someone that said they checked with the post office about it

From Bulk Permit #1455 (the permit that is used for mailing absentee ballots)

What I have found is that there was activity only on that account on October 2nd (1,605 pieces) and October 13th. (28,000 pieces) There was no activity in between those to dates.

I asked if the submission and billing occurs on the same day. And the computer showed that yes the bulk mailing was received by USPS on the 13th and billed on the 13th.

-snip-

Before I left I repeated myself "no activity from the between the 2nd and 13th?" She said "No activity"

I will confirm with the supervisor that there are no other bulk permits used for absentee ballots.

[ImphClinton]

Thanks for the post.

If true this should sink King County. They should be forced to count more Absentee Ballots rejected because of the post date. These votes could eaisly reverse the election.

[Hank Rearden]

Bulk-permit mailings normally do not get postmarked; there's no evidence of date of mailing except the paperwork on file at the post office.

Once it gets into the military system for forwarding, though, things might be different.