Your inability even to admit your assumptions is indeed a "hole".
Why do creationists always go to personal attack?
Why do you assume that I'm a "creationist?" And does not your use of the term consitute a persobal attack? And for that matter, when you use the term "creationist," what does it mean?
Answer: Because no science is available to them.
If you construe the application of logic to the comments you've made to be "a personal attack," then I suspect your motivations have less to do with "science" than with personal opinion.
But as the let's start fresh. Please refer back to post #230 and answer the questions I've posed.
First, admit that you are a creationist.
If you are a scientist that knows evolution is a fact, I have no need to debate you.