[narby]

The distiquishing mark of both IDers and creationists is that their goal seems to be the destruction of Evolution theory, not in advancing their own. That and the fact they are both basing their ideas on their belief in a diety, rather than on the examination of the evidence in a positive manner. Their actions are negative (tearing down Evolution) rather than positive (promoting their discoveries).

And neither groups seem inclined to defend their own beliefs, only to attack. I've have posted critiques on Genesis 1 and 2 on two crevo threads now, with not a single reply to defend.

[jwalsh07]

I don't have time for a point by point refutation or debate but here is something to chew on. You seem to be concerned that light comes before dark in Genesis. Are you also concerned that light comes before dark in the BBT?

Another thing to chew on is that the Torah defines the word "choshech" as both darkness and black energy. Now how did them guys know about dark matter all those moons ago? :-}

More chew:

Genesis predicted a beginning millenium ago. BBT caught up in the 20th Century. Amazing, eh?

[Sola Veritas]

"I've have posted critiques on Genesis 1 and 2 on two crevo threads now, with not a single reply to defend."

I have told you pointedly that your exegesis of text is poor. I personally am not going to spend the long time it would take to give you classes on proper hermeneutics. Besides, you are not interested in learning as evidenced by your dogged insistence that IDers and Creationists are the same when I have clearly showed you the difference. If you cannot grasp the vast fundamental differences
between a special creationist and a theistic evolution proponet (i.e. Iders) then there is no way to carry on a meaningful/fruitful discussion with you. I leave you alone in peace.