Evidently you missed my point entirely. He showed his cards when he said "The theory of evolution is irrelevant to the subject of God." Those are HIS words, not mine. I merely quoted him. That is the entire basis and reason for the theory of evolution. It seeks the origins of a universe in which THE EXISTENCE OF GOD IS IRRELEVANT. If you can't see or understand that, I will pray for your eyes to be opened.Again, here is what was said:
Narby:"The theory of evolution is irrelevant to the subject of God."He did not in any way, shape, or form say that God is irrelevant - period. He said that the theory of evolution is not relevant to the subject of God. To accuse him of "showing his cards", you must turn his words around - shoving words in his mouth that he did not say or mean.
(and he goes in to say God could have created evolution)
GLDNGUN: "And that's the problem. God is NOT irrelevant."
" And now to quote you..."It's so very common, I'm not picking on you. It would just be refreshing to have a thread where people argued only the points that are actually made."You know... I said that as a kind and friendly gesture... Yet you - a "Christian" - throw in my face as as a cut, full of sarcasm. That says a lot.
Touche!
"It seeks the origins of a universe in which THE EXISTENCE OF GOD IS IRRELEVANT. "
False! Biology doesn't care about the origins of the universe or the origins of life. The biological theory of evolution contains neither of these concepts.
As usual, the creationist strawman rears its ugly head.
I am a scientist and a Christian. There is no contradiction between the Bible and science, if you don't hold the Bible to a superficial and silly meaning.
You know... I said that as a kind and friendly gesture... Yet you - a "Christian" - throw in my face as as a cut, full of sarcasm.
I simply quoted you. If you think those words sound harsh, then perhaps you shouldn't have typed them in the first place.