Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US official: US-China economic relations have never been better
Xinhuanet ^ | 2005-01-10

Posted on 01/10/2005 12:31:07 PM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

HONG KONG, Jan. 10 (Xinhuanet) -- Under Secretary of the US Commerce Department Grant Aldonas said here Thursday that the economic and trade relations between the United States and China have never been better and that China is now a very open market.

"China's exports to the United States and the United States exports to China have grown very significantly," the under secretary in charge of international trade said, adding that China and the United States are important trading partners to each other.

He said as China and the United States are two important economic forces in the world, the economic development of China has been the major driving force to the world economy.

He said a good US-China economic and trade relationship is not only in the interest of American and Chinese, but has a broader impact. In this aspect, it is the responsibility of the two countries to better manage the relationship and solve conflicts.

He noted that the Chinese market is quite open now, especially after China's entry into the WTO. "I often remind my friends in the United States that how open the Chinese market is," he said.

He said the United States welcomes the measures that the Chinese government takes to fulfill its WTO commitment, such as judiciary explanation of the intellectual property law, and elimination of some trade barriers.

He said that an open Chinese market benefits the developed countries, and developing countries as well.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; geopolitics; globalism; reddragonrising; thebusheconomy; trade; wariscoming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2005 12:31:08 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neutrino

ping


2 posted on 01/10/2005 12:31:43 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

The Chinese ought to start spending some of the dollars they are getting from us.


3 posted on 01/10/2005 12:33:26 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

4 posted on 01/10/2005 12:34:22 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
They do. They spend it developing all the weapons systems they stole from our intelligence services during the Clinton Administration.

Bush should yank MFN and, like Reagan, run them till the wheels fall off.

5 posted on 01/10/2005 12:35:58 PM PST by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Our myopic politicians and businessmen are getting very chummy with a communist government whose military and political party still sees America as an enemy.

Just because western businessmen and politicians think the world revolves around the corporate bottom line doesn't mean the Chinese think the same way.


6 posted on 01/10/2005 12:38:29 PM PST by Noachian (A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noachian

I guarantee you they are NOT!


7 posted on 01/10/2005 12:46:32 PM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

on what ?......have we started manufacturing anything ?


8 posted on 01/10/2005 12:55:49 PM PST by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Thanks for the ping, Willie Greene.

While it is open to debate whether China has a more open economy, it may will be irrelevant. The United States has largely squandered its manufacturing base. How are we to export goods to China if we do not produce any goods?

9 posted on 01/10/2005 1:01:02 PM PST by neutrino (Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I'm sure Ji Shan who was convicted of having a second live birth and was sentenced to six years of hard labor for the state legcuffed to a laser fabric cutting machine is delighted to hear this.


10 posted on 01/10/2005 1:43:47 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The Chinese ought to start spending some of the dollars they are getting from us.

They do. Pitchblende doesn't grow on trees.
11 posted on 01/10/2005 1:47:47 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neutrino; LowCountryJoe; 1rudeboy
How are we to export goods to China if we do not produce any goods?

So, if we don't produce any goods, aren't the Chinese idiots for accepting our dollars?

12 posted on 01/10/2005 3:45:44 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
So, if we don't produce any goods, aren't the Chinese idiots for accepting our dollars?

First they build their manufacturing base. Then, after we've disposed of our manufacturing infrastructure, they have an easy, effective way to control us. Or, to defeat us.

That's the difference between long term thinking (the Chinese), versus those deluded fools who lust for cheap, shoddy goods while simpering about lower prices to consumers.

13 posted on 01/10/2005 3:51:10 PM PST by neutrino (Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
First they build their manufacturing base. Then, after we've disposed of our manufacturing infrastructure, they have an easy, effective way to control us. Or, to defeat us.

You didn't answer the question. Aren't they idiots for accepting our dollars if we make nothing they would buy?

14 posted on 01/10/2005 4:05:12 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You didn't answer the question. Aren't they idiots for accepting our dollars if we make nothing they would buy?

On the contrary, I did. It appears my expectations for your understanding were too high. I will, therefore, be careful to spell out my answer.

The Chinese are aiming for a long-term strategy. The decline in the dollar does injure them. However, they are willing to accept this loss to gain a long-term advantage.

Please note that this leads to my earlier answer: First they build their manufacturing base. Then, after we've disposed of our manufacturing infrastructure, they have an easy, effective way to control us. Or, to defeat us.

Further, they can use their collected dollar assets to buy resources; for example, the Wall Street Journal reports that China National Offshore Oil is considering a takeover of Unocal Corp., the ninth-largest oil company in the U.S.

No, the Chinese are not idiots. The free traitors, on the other hand, are.

15 posted on 01/10/2005 4:25:20 PM PST by neutrino (Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

So, we need more government regulation to prevent trading, correct?


16 posted on 01/10/2005 4:54:45 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (Many things in moderation, some with conservation, few in immoderation, all because of liberation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

So you were wrong, we do make stuff they will buy, oil companies.


17 posted on 01/10/2005 4:57:56 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
on what ?......have we started manufacturing anything ?

Who is "we?" What country do you live in?

18 posted on 01/10/2005 5:40:46 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

Boy, the fact that our manufacturing base has been healthy for 19 straight months (or more) must really steam you.


19 posted on 01/10/2005 5:42:50 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
Absolutly:
The prototype ME 109 was powered by a British built engine.
The jet engine that made the MiG a threat to US servicemen (read that "us" as in you and I) was powered by a license built copy of the British NENE engine.
Douglas Aircraft sold the complete plans of the DC-3/C47 to the Imperial Japanese Army in the late 30s.
As late as 1939, Douglas aircraft sold a complete DC-4/C-54 to the IJA. These was after they shot up and bombed our gunboats in China. We meekly accepted cash reparations and the people of Japan and their leaders saw us as a people who were totally money driven.
20 posted on 01/10/2005 5:55:10 PM PST by investigateworld (( 'nuff said! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson