"Hard to see ... and, evidently, impossible to admit."
LOL, touche. These guys spent all the time, when there were *real* crimes occuring in the White House, explaining why those scandals were excusable or political witch hunts.
Lying before a criminal grand jury is a crime is a crime is a crime. They never showed any error by Judge Starr, yet they spent gobs of time calling him biased and trying to destroy him personally.
(pedantic point: I'd have edited previous poster's comment to read not so much "hard to see" as "hard to prove")
Point well taken. And that bias is still around, everywhere you look.
I'm not quite as keen about editing posters' comments. I think the report issued today had something to say about context. :)