Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS exonerates Heyward, praises "an executive of integrity and talent"
AP ^ | 01/10/05 | CBS

Posted on 01/10/2005 8:30:52 AM PST by Fido969

Excerpt from CBS press release:

-----------------

This brings us to two senior figures at CBS News whose performance is discussed in some depth in the Panel's report. Based on the findings of that report, we believe the following is appropriate:

The Panel found that Dan Rather was pushed to the limit in the week before the September 8th broadcast. He was finishing up the anchoring job at the 2004 Republican Convention and was covering Hurricane Frances in Florida. He asked the right questions initially, but then made the same errors of credulity and over-enthusiasm that beset many of his colleagues in regard to this segment. He was convinced that the documents were authenticated because he was told in no uncertain terms that this was so. He defended the story over-zealously afterwards; again, he believed in a star associate with whom he had worked often, and to award-winning result. The Panel has found that his unwillingness to consider that CBS News and his colleague were in the wrong was a mistake, and that the broadcast would have benefited from a more direct involvement on Rather's part.

Dan Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken personal responsibility for his part in the broadcast. He voluntarily moved to set a date to step down from the CBS Evening News anchor chair in March of 2005, which will give him more time to concentrate on his reporting for CBS NEWS. After examining the report and thinking about its implications, we believe any further action would not be appropriate.

This brings us to CBS NEWS President Andrew Heyward. The Panel's report shows that before the segment was broadcast, Heyward explicitly warned West and Howard that "we will have to defend 'every syllable' of the segment and, as we mentioned earlier, specifically urged them not to allow the production team to 'stampede us.'" In the aftermath of the report, he issued direct instructions to investigate the sourcing of the story and the authentication of the documents and pressed for his staff to come up with new and substantive information rather than merely standing by the story in a "stubborn repetition of what we've already said." However, the Panel concluded that Heyward's directives were not implemented in a prompt or systematic way.

This raises questions about accountability at CBS News -- questions that will have to be addressed both by Andrew Heyward and me. We intend to do so. But Heyward is an executive of integrity and talent, and the right person to be leading CBS NEWS during this challenging time.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: baloney; cbs; documents; heyward; hogwash; integritymybutt; mapes; moralrelativism; planetofthemapes; rather; rita
Hmmm....
1 posted on 01/10/2005 8:30:53 AM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Look at document/attachment 1A to the report - they have Lawrence Korb (a very familiar face and name in the media) own as "Larry Corb". Pretty sloppy work, but then again they were investigating CBS...
2 posted on 01/10/2005 8:34:06 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Heyward still let it on the air. He's as biased as Rather.


3 posted on 01/10/2005 8:38:42 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (If I've told you once, I've told you a thousand times: No cliches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
So, now all Rather is guilty of is "errors of credulity" and "over-enthusiasm." Is that why he maintained (after the authenticity of the Killian documents was put into question) that even if the documents were forgeries the underlying assertions were true. However, if the underlying assertions were true why did someone produce forged documents. Why didn't the person who claimed the underlying truth of the assertions simply provide an affidavit as to what he or she had seen or heard, rather than seeking to "recreate" whatever was seen or heard by preparing documents that were intended to look original and real? Rather is guilty of a lot more than errors of credulity and over-enthusiasm.
4 posted on 01/10/2005 8:42:02 AM PST by Pharlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Poor overworked Dan. Pushed to his limits with all his responsibilities. He just had too many things to do and once he found out about the possibility that he might be wrong, he was "overzealous" in defending his actions. Does anyone really buy this?
5 posted on 01/10/2005 8:47:21 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Any stupid, biased and incompetent news department could have run the story. It takes CBS and its star investigators, three monts later, to say they can't prove the documents are fake.

How is it that in two and a half months, no one has produced a contemporary (1970) document, from any source whatsoever, that matches the typeface?


6 posted on 01/10/2005 8:48:14 AM PST by js1138 (D*mn, I Missed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

I'm still waiting for someone at CBS to explain how you can definitively authenticate a document from a copy.


7 posted on 01/10/2005 8:48:54 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Dan Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken personal responsibility for his part in the broadcast.


Funny, I don't remember him apologizing to Pres. Bush after he tried to hang a bogus story on him.


8 posted on 01/10/2005 8:52:44 AM PST by lonerepubinma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Poor overworked Dan.

"It wasn't his fault. He had access to a large staff of researchers, he had experts in authorizing these documents, he has people who go get his coffee for him so he doesn't have to get off his butt. But he is overworked. "

Wonder what the excuse was for all the other so-called INVESTIGATIONS by 60MINUTES in the past, that have been found to be totally BOGUS?

9 posted on 01/10/2005 9:23:36 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (>The government of our country was meant to be a servant of the people, not a master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Poor overworked Dan.

"It wasn't his fault. He had access to a large staff of researchers, he had experts in authorizing these documents, he has people who go get his coffee for him so he doesn't have to get off his butt. But he is overworked. "

Wonder what the excuse was for all the other so-called INVESTIGATIONS by 60MINUTES in the past, that have been found to be totally BOGUS?

10 posted on 01/10/2005 9:28:41 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (>The government of our country was meant to be a servant of the people, not a master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
12 The man said, Rather and Heyward said "The woman (Mapes) you put here with me-she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it."
11 posted on 01/10/2005 9:32:16 AM PST by Raycpa (Alias, VRWC_minion,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
My wife and I always get a hoot out of hearing about these multimillionaires complain how much they have to do. I remembered listening to Kathy Lee Giffford complained how she had to get up early every morning to have a limousine bring her and her kids to the studio just so the make-up artists could get her ready for her TV show with Reggis while her children received free day care. After that we stopped watching.

You're right. Dan has plenty of staff and assistants to make sure the stories are correct. He knew what he was doing.

12 posted on 01/10/2005 9:38:43 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Three women got fired, even the lady whose job was to read transcripts for 40 years

Meanwhile, the two people most responsible for the story, two leftist men, get a pass.

It's not a good day the feminazis.

Fired:

Mary Murphy, senior broadcast producer,
Esther Kartiganer, senior producer, transcript reader
Betsy West, senior vice president

13 posted on 01/10/2005 9:44:46 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969
Dan Rather has already apologized for the segment and taken personal responsibility for his part in the broadcast.

I saw the apology. I know what an apology is....

That, was no apology.
14 posted on 01/10/2005 9:45:54 AM PST by Zarro (We Support Governor Rossi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
It's not a good day the feminazis.

And being good feminazis, they won't utter a word to protest the fact that the men responsible are still there...

15 posted on 01/10/2005 9:46:55 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Ah, yes. Poor Mary Mapes, the innocent victim. My heart goes out to her.


16 posted on 01/10/2005 8:56:17 PM PST by mfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson