Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eno_

THe next step = ok with you = is the total ban of all political speech.

Have you any idea what the FIRST AMENDMENT was written for? NO?

It wass written to PROTECT POLITICAL SPEECH - not for nambla to go seek little boys to screw! But that would be ok to you?

If they succeed in this small jerk of the chain, the final goal of these monarchists & TYRRANTS is to block ALL FREE SPEECH if it is political, and as a BONUS, they can ban ALL ads for recruiting of Army, Navy, CoastGuard ,and Marines!

THAT is also one of your ultimate goals also!

You would prefer that there can only be advertisements where the host/station/ownswers/stockholders do NOT believe in the company/source?

Why can't anybody have an ad ...let's say for SNAPPLE ... and during the show say "I like Snapple." ?? That is called FREE SPEECH --- He can also say -without the threat of being arrested, like all of you want to befall Williams- "I hate Snapple." SO?!? He will love an advertiser, but is is free speech.

If Williams, during his show, screamed and hollered like an idiot on how stupid the president was right after playing the govt ad ... would there have been a protest from you? Hardly!


32 posted on 01/10/2005 7:59:52 AM PST by steplock (http://www.outoftimeradio.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: steplock
You're a sorry S-O-B for your post #33. Don't think just because it was yanked that it wasn't seen.


36 posted on 01/10/2005 8:24:50 AM PST by rdb3 (Real men don't whine. It's 2005 and everyone's gonna feel it this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: steplock
THe next step = ok with you = is the total ban of all political speech.

Uh huh, humiliating government propagandists is the END OF FREE SPEECH??? Yeah, sure, whatever.

You apperently didn't read my comments. Advertizing is making an honest living. There are laws against domestic propaganda for a reason. Even the legally sanctioned propagandsists deserve to be spat on and humiliated. Was Tommy Thomspon right to LIE about one of the anthrax victims "was a hunter," "drank from a stream?" No, he is a lying sack of excrement, and deserves every bit of derision heaped on him.

48 posted on 01/10/2005 9:30:23 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson