Heck, the NYTimes didn't cover it! Isn't NYC Hillary's home town now? Yankees fan and everything?
Well, the Times reprinted the AP article. However, they didn't have any staff reporters cover it. The LA Times, Chicago Sun... even Newsday and NYPost had staff reporters on it!
But not the Times. This is the paper that prides itself on actually having reporters covering news of regional, national and international importance. And, these are the people who pride themselves for covering stories before they become nationally covered. Since this has been going on for over a year, the NYTimes of their propaganda should've had the scoop a long time ago!
And, Salon.com doesn't seem to have a story on it either.
..sounds like the editor(s) are afraid of "a Arkansas Dirt Nap" ..from the Shrillary's Little Rock Mafia.
The media have a code word for this. It's called "Getting It Right".
Getting it right implies fairness and accuracy, but what it really means is...
1. Suppressing stories that do not conform with the progressive agenda is "Getting is right". (Hillary is now one of the principal elements of the progressive agenda.) and,
2. Emphasizing stories that reinforce their favorite issues is "Getting is right". (Promoting political allies and attacking political enemies are among their favorite issues).
We here at FreeRepublic know all of this, of course. However, just listen for their code words, "Getting it right".
Nothing to see here folks, just move along.
Anyone heard anything about Sandy Berger getting caught red handed stuffing documents down his pants (and in his socks) regarding the Clintons failure to capture Bin Laden?
Nah, I didn't think so.
After noting the address, I just wondered is this a Gannett rag?