Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RockAgainsttheLeft04

Maybe you misunderstood my point.

If marriage is not defined (as it has been since the beginning of time) as ONLY between one man and one woman, then the door is open for any type of "joinings" being considered "marriage" --- maybe 3 people want to get "married" to each other and have a "trio marriage." What would happen to the basic, moral boundaries?

What if some perverted mother wants to "marry" her son? Or a twisted father "marry" his daughter?

If gay people want to shack up with each other, then no one can stop them (except God, of course).

But no one wants the definition of marriage (both morally and legally) changed for their "lifestyle."

Surely you can understand this point, yes?


68 posted on 01/09/2005 2:49:30 PM PST by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Cedar

Maybe you failed to read my previous post, so I will make my position as clearly and loudly as I can make it.

(*cough* *cough*) Marry a man. Marry a tranny. Marry your grandma. Marry your daughter (if she is of the age of consent). Marry 2 people. Marry 9 people.

You are sick, you are perverted. Maybe you will even go to Hell. Don't expect an invitation to dinner at my house, but it's IT'S NONE OF MY BUSINESS!!!

And it's none of the federal government's either.


71 posted on 01/09/2005 3:13:49 PM PST by RockAgainsttheLeft04 (Chaos is great. Chaos is what killed the dinosaurs, darling. -- from Heathers (1989))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson