While I guess I don't really care - What ever happened to simply disclosing the indictment when it comes down, in the normal course. ANY interference by anyone in the process is wrong, whether it is to rush it or delay it for political or other advantage. 2 posted on 01/08/2005 2:17:44 PM CST by drt1
217 posted on 01/09/2005 7:54:10 PM CST by UCANSEE2 (>The government of our country was meant to be a servant of the people, not a master.) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Sounds like a very well reasoned comment to me. It still fails the test that Bush should use it to his own political advantage however. The honorable poster said no such thing.
I'm confused. Was the poster (UCANSEE2) implying that I suggested that W should have used the indictment for political advantage? If so, you were right in your reading - I said no such thing and, in fact, said just the opposite - Arguing for COMPLETE agnosticism re: Things outside of the elections process (Of which this is one).
I'm surprised it could have been construed otherwise.
True. I said IMPLIED, and perhaps I was not clear about my use of that word.
I meant he/she referred to someone else stating that BUSH was doing this for advantage in the elections. (Hence: Implied Reference).
But, read to the end of the thread, and you will find a direct qoute.