To: kattracks; AFPhys; prairiebreeze; onyx; Texasforever; CyberAnt; BigSkyFreeper; Tamsey; ...
Justice Department spokesman Bryan Sierra told the Times, "All we can say is that there are no additional subjects at this time." At this time???
Kind of makes a person go Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BRING ON THE POPCORN!
12 posted on
01/08/2005 12:20:59 PM PST by
Mo1
(Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
To: Mo1
BRING ON THE POPCORN! Its Hollywood....I want milk-duds
17 posted on
01/08/2005 12:23:36 PM PST by
woofie
(Proudly posting inane comments since 1998)
To: Mo1
You know, much as I admire the president's ability to turn the other cheek and his high regard for the office of the presidency, his continuing protection of the Clintons has reached a height that I am not in favor of.
Protecting the Clintons does not further the presidency...it only permits them to continue with their illegal activities and further disgrace Bill's former presidency and her senatorial position.
92 posted on
01/08/2005 1:48:24 PM PST by
Peach
To: Mo1
Part of me is glad Bush kept it sealed, and the other part of me wishes Bush would have done the decent thing and had the indictment sealed.
But, Dan Rather would have called the documents a forgery. /sarcasm
115 posted on
01/08/2005 6:49:46 PM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(PEST/Suicide Hotline 1-800-BUSH-WON)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson