Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grut
(in violation of the 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial)

Doesn't this apply when someone is actually charged with a crime?

I don't believe an indictment is the same thing.

111 posted on 01/08/2005 5:31:05 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
Doesn't [the Sixth Amendment] apply when someone is actually charged with a crime?

I'm not really sure: but certainly the farther you get from an alleged crime, the more evidence is lost. If nothing else, potentially exonerating witnesses die, for instance. So once the prosecution has put its case together (which it has, through the grand jury process) the Sixth Amendment seems to me to require that the defense be allowed to begin preparing its case at once.

131 posted on 01/09/2005 4:30:00 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Doesn't this apply when someone is actually charged with a crime?

I don't believe an indictment is the same thing.

An indictment *is* a formal charge. It's a grand jury saying that there is sufficient reason to believe a crime has been committed to go to trial.

151 posted on 01/09/2005 9:39:21 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson