the Bush Justice Department decided that any criminal charges would not be made public until after last fall's presidential election for fear they would be seen as a politically tainted vendetta by the Bush Administration." Which is exactly how the MSM would have portrayed it.
The decision to keep the politically awkward indictment under wraps allowed Mr. and Mrs. Clinton to assume high profile roles attacking President Bush on the Iraq war, as well as a whole range of domestic issues, without having to answer questions about their role in Rosen's case.
As if anyone, especiially the MSM would have asked these questions,
1 posted on
01/08/2005 12:13:31 PM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: kattracks
And the Bush administration covers up for the Clinton's ---- Again.
If, when, she wins in 2008, they (the Bush "handlers" who are scared shirtless of the MSM) have ONLY themselves to blame.
64 posted on
01/08/2005 12:51:15 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: kattracks
Bush has always been too nice to them. Hillary must be stopped before 2006.
103 posted on
01/08/2005 3:51:55 PM PST by
doug from upland
(THE RED STATES - celebrate a great American tradition)
To: kattracks
"David Rosen was actually indicted in 2003" "2003"??? What the hell is going on here? Look at the 2002 date at the top of the indictment below...
--Boot Hill
126 posted on
01/09/2005 2:29:00 AM PST by
Boot Hill
(Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!!!)
To: kattracks
"I'm a star witness against President and Mrs. Clinton. . . ." In that case I'm sure glad I'm not your insurance underwriter.
To: kattracks
We know that if positions had been reversed, the democrats would have seized on it as a campaign issue. Watergate redux or whatever. That said, I wish republicans, at the very least, would consider Americans first and let the chips fall where they may.
128 posted on
01/09/2005 3:31:49 AM PST by
hershey
To: kattracks; All
What all this REALLY means is that there is no difference in the two parties, down deep they cover each others A$$e$ and care not about the people.
132 posted on
01/09/2005 4:36:14 AM PST by
ChefKeith
(If a pig loses its voice, is it disgruntled?)
To: kattracks
Once again, Thank you for posting/hosting the article.
In Sept. 2003, Mrs. Clinton went so far as to accuse the White House of corruption, saying Bush officials had deliberately covered up unhealthy air quality at Ground Zero in the days after the 9/11 attacks.
Yeah, cause the collapse of the twin towers was a well kept secret, and Bush had aliens paint the DUST that was in the air with invisible paint so no one would be able to tell the air was saturated with pollutants and dust.
133 posted on
01/09/2005 7:55:50 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(>The government of our country was meant to be a servant of the people, not a master.)
To: kattracks
Celebrity fundraiser Aaron Tonken, another key figure in the probe, has also suggested that Mrs. Clinton may face legal trouble because of his testimony about work he did for the former first couple.I doubt it. More likely Mr. Tonken may face sudden accidental or suicidal death.
134 posted on
01/09/2005 7:58:24 AM PST by
UCANSEE2
(>The government of our country was meant to be a servant of the people, not a master.)
To: kattracks
Didn't read thru all the posts so someone may have already advanced this theory ... the indictment news broke late Friday afternoon ... a typical Clintonista ploy. However could it be it broke this past Friday because they were anticipating the Rather TNAG memogate findings would be revealed the same day? Which, of course, would further bury the indictment.
143 posted on
01/09/2005 8:32:40 AM PST by
BluH2o
To: kattracks
Those FBI files Hillary had must have contained some pretty good stuff on the Bush family!
Please explain to me why the Bush Family continues to lavish praise on the Clinton and Kennedy Klans when each and every time they get kicked in the teeth?
.
To: kattracks
Okay. The election's over.
Now the Justice Department better go for the throat.
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
"If your porch collapses, and more than three illegal campaign contributors are crushed, you might be the DNC."
171 posted on
01/09/2005 1:41:55 PM PST by
185JHP
( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
To: kattracks
"While under secret federal indictment"
That is scary! "Secret" indictments???
To: kattracks
My guess is that Bob Shrum will go to Jail. That would make him 0-9!
Pray for W and Our Troops
239 posted on
01/09/2005 7:04:43 PM PST by
bray
(The First of 4 More Years!)
To: kattracks
But when will they ever get the SLUT herself?
243 posted on
01/09/2005 7:09:59 PM PST by
RWCon
(P)
To: kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson