To: weegee
Big yawn...there's no real point in going any further with this.
436 posted on
01/09/2005 6:53:43 PM PST by
garbanzo
(Free people will set the course of history)
To: garbanzo
Got no answer to the Sex Positive Agenda. Can't make jokes about people advocating for sexually active children.
437 posted on
01/09/2005 7:05:57 PM PST by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
To: garbanzo
If you bother to read through that page, you will see that is the advocates FOR Sex Positive teaching, not someone trying to cast their agenda in a negative light.
Why can't you defend the practice? Do you really believe that it is that different from teaching children about "sexual identity"?
438 posted on
01/09/2005 7:08:05 PM PST by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
To: garbanzo; All
Having read close to 400 posts on this topic -- and some were very good -- I feel that the personal attacks on garbano's sexual orientation were a discredit to the spirit of inquiry and to some of the good points he put forward. Not that I agree with everything that he said, but this does nothing for the pursuit of truth.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson