No I said you should consider the possibility.
I am saying that in a position of such power it should not be that unexpected.
No I said you should consider the possibility.
No, you didn’t. You said it would be naïve to believe that if Clinton killed people Bush didn’t, as if killing political opponents was part of the job description. Here, in your own words, is what I was responding to:
I am a Bush supporter but I am not so naive to think that if the last President was bumping people off then the current one won't be.
Now you’re backtracking, perhaps because you’re starting to realize it was an idiotic statement. Your new statement is equally absurd:
I am saying that in a position of such power it should not be that unexpected.
Of course it should be “unexpected”! If it is ever proven, against any public office holder, they should be tried, and if convicted, they should be executed. The absolute bare minimum that should be “expected” of a politician is that the don’t kill their political opponents. Are you living in 1920s Russia?