Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Submarine Runs Aground South of Guam
The Associated Press ^ | Jan 8, 2005 | The Associated Press

Posted on 01/08/2005 3:19:47 AM PST by Jet Jaguar

HONOLULU (AP) - A nuclear submarine ran aground about 350 miles south of Guam, injuring several sailors, one of them critically, the Navy said.

There were no reports of damage to the USS San Francisco's reactor plant, which was operating normally, the Navy said.

Jon Yoshishige, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Fleet based at Pearl Harbor, said the Friday afternoon incident is under investigation and the 360-foot submarine was headed back to its home port in Guam.

Details on the sailors' injuries were not immediately available. The sub has a crew of 137, officials said.

Military and Coast Guard aircraft from Guam were en route to monitor the submarine and assist if needed, the Navy said.

Guam is a U.S. territory about 3,700 miles southwest of Hawaii.

---

On the Net:

U.S. Pacific Fleet: http://www.cpf.navy.mil

AP-ES-01-08-05 0343EST


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: guam; shipwreck; silentservice; ssn711; submarine; usn; usssanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 1,101-1,102 next last
To: Southack
See post #114 for an incomplete list of previous sub-sub collisions.
401 posted on 01/08/2005 9:49:33 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: mudblood

Rocks and shoals..
article 4 section 10

http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq59-7.htm


402 posted on 01/08/2005 9:49:59 AM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
In this photo released by the US Navy the attack submarine USS San Francisco (SSN 711) is escorted by two harbor tugs returns to Apra Harbor, Guam, after a five-month deployment June 4, 2004.  The USS San Francisco ran aground about 350 miles south of Guam, injuring several sailors, one of them critically, the Navy said late Friday Jan. 7, 2005. (AP Photo/US Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Mark A. Leonesio)

In this photo released by the US Navy the attack submarine USS San Francisco (SSN 711) is escorted by two harbor tugs returns to Apra Harbor, Guam, after a five-month deployment June 4, 2004. The USS San Francisco ran aground about 350 miles south of Guam, injuring several sailors, one of them critically, the Navy said late Friday Jan. 7, 2005. (AP Photo/US Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Mark A. Leonesio)


403 posted on 01/08/2005 9:50:58 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz; submarinerswife
And, it could have simply ran right through an 80 ton blue whale at 20+ knots.....

Not quite running aground, but the effect is similar to hitting a truck at high speed.

(Don't worry too much about the ballast tanks being bent or damaged, as far as keeping the ship afloat. If the "running aground" occurred at any angle at all, then only the bottom is bent/torn up/damaged, and the sub ballast tanks are open to sea water anyway all the time.

If the sonar dome hit, and it almost certainly did, then it's destroyed, but again, the structural integrity of the fiberglass sonar dome isn't affecting the structural integrity of the ballast tanks (which are behind the sonar dome.) If the sonar dome and sonar mounting structure (the HY-80 sphere itself that is inside the fiberglass sonar dome) were damaged, or even torn off, then there is a watertight door that isolates the sonar sphere and its electronics and trans
404 posted on 01/08/2005 9:52:06 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
You're no Navy man.
You run aground, you're fired.
Period.
I saw it happen often in Vietnam with LST's.

This Captain is so fired.

405 posted on 01/08/2005 9:52:46 AM PST by Dan Cooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt..

Well and good, but Naval commanders know the consequences of something like this are a hearing, and a forced retirement. it's just part of their code.

406 posted on 01/08/2005 9:53:33 AM PST by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jriemer

My thoughts exactly


407 posted on 01/08/2005 9:53:54 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Nimitz

Thanks for the report Nimitz. I had a suspicion.

It sounded that way to me after the initial report, but I didnt want to raise an alarm without facts present. Thanks for letting me know. I suggest all subvets on FR stand ready to help out in any way we can. This looks to be bad.


For people who arent submariners:

A 6900 ton submarine hitting a submerged object during transit is nothing to minimize. The deceleration is enough to throw people arond and make objects fly. People can be killed by missile hazards, equipment coming unbolted from its foundations and crushing them, or even the old cliche of a torpedo breaking a strap and falling on someone.


The boat will probably need a lot of time in the yards, or may even be out of commission for good.

Prayers for all the guys on the San Francisco.


408 posted on 01/08/2005 9:55:00 AM PST by judicial meanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: rsobin; TexKat
"My son Zack is aboard. Please for the crew."

Dear rsobin, TexKat alerted me to your post, and I wanted you to know that I'm thinking about you and your son and the crew. Don't worry, I'm sure everything is going to be OK. That aside, I'm concentrating as hard as I can with prayer and good thoughts for you, your darling, giving, awesome, strong, brave, protector of ALL us Americans that-are-so-PROUD-of-him son, and his likewise fellow great shipmates. I'll check back in a while on you and them, but know that hard prayers are going up from us FReepers, but also that all will no doubt be OK. We're with you, rsobin.

Thank you, Tex...a bunch.

409 posted on 01/08/2005 9:55:12 AM PST by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: rsobin

Hope your son is OK


410 posted on 01/08/2005 9:57:08 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
No.

A tsunami, underwater in deep water (300-1500 feet), passes "around" at submarine not "through" or "against" the submarine ; as it travels, the tsunami is not a "shock wave" like the sudden pressure wave that comes from an underwater explosion.
411 posted on 01/08/2005 9:57:13 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

Comment #412 Removed by Moderator

To: Nimitz

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cocoon/ihas/loc.natlib.ihas.100010427/default.html
Eternal Father, strong to save

May God be with the families who wait for news,may the rumors be untrue about the dead.
I pray for those who are injured.

There is a father on this thread...His son's name is Zack.


413 posted on 01/08/2005 9:58:18 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: El Gran Salseron; Doohickey
Found this tangential factoid:

During a night surface attack on February 7, 1943, USS GROWLER became engaged in a life and death struggle with a Japanese vessel which attempted to ram the submarine. Commander Gilmore was able to turn the tables and rammed the enemy instead. Now close alongside the Japanese ship, GROWLER's bridge was sprayed by deadly machine gun fire. Gilmore got everyone below to safety except himself. Badly wounded, he knew that it would take too long to be carried below and anyone attempting to do so would be exposed to enemy fire. Every second that GROWLER remained on the surface increased her vulnerability to attack and sinking. Gilmore ordered "Take her down,' without him. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for this selfless act of heroism.source

414 posted on 01/08/2005 9:59:06 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: CenturionM

You really don't want the "pleasure" of playing with SUBROC's.

Granted, it's sovbering to see the actual nuke warhead, but there's no real valid reason to use one....

Unless you're a Taiwanese sub looking at several hundred landing craft headed into your island!


415 posted on 01/08/2005 9:59:45 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I cant see enought detail in that pic but if the sail is hammered, we're talking collision


416 posted on 01/08/2005 10:00:08 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Absolutely.

All of what you say is entirely possible---if not actually the case; But given that I wasn't there, I'd like to see how it develops. As you know, sometimes there is a mitigating factor.

He might have been sprinting to regain a lost contact---and doing so in shallow waters is a no-no. If he did that he was operating outside the envelope.

I AM hoping that it was not the case. I'd just hate to see the Force get another black eye. (whether real or perceived)


One last---I remember a boat that hit a rockpile at 10 Kt. There was a few injuries (a few sprains and one fairly deep laceration) they also had one injury that was serious only because the casualty was a TM inspecting a tube. the impact sent his head into the ID and gave him a helluva skull fracture. the doc did a great job there too....


417 posted on 01/08/2005 10:01:04 AM PST by fastattacksailor (The US without the UN is like not having your mother-in-law with you on your honeymoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: mylife

That picture of the SSN San FRancisco is from June 2004, not taken recently.

I should have bolded that in the caption.

:-)


418 posted on 01/08/2005 10:02:32 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: deaconjim

What's funky is closing the hatch in Groton at 23 degrees and snowing winds under cloudy skies, wearing thremals and snowsuits and full winter gear, then opening it again in PR at 92 degrees and sunny skies.

And never seeing the weather, skies, or wind in between!


419 posted on 01/08/2005 10:03:40 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Im so observent L0L


420 posted on 01/08/2005 10:03:47 AM PST by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 1,101-1,102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson