Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Perata wants more state control
Oakland Tribune ^ | 1/7/05 | Steve Geissinger

Posted on 01/07/2005 10:37:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge

SACRAMENTO — The second-most-powerful California politician is proposing the state seize some zoning power from cities and counties to build projects that round out areas like Oakland and the East Bay as transportation hubs, where even depressed inner-city housing would then bloom — an issue voters may decide this year.

The proposal to ease sprawl, traffic congestion and housing prices is opposed by cities and counties but could go to voters this turbulent political year — with or without the support of Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The governor is planning to call a statewide special election on a wide array of reforms, whether the Democrat-dominated Legislature approves the proposals or not. If it's without the support of Democrats, majority lawmakers said they'll put their own competing measures on the ballot.

Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, D-Oakland, said Schwarzenegger's salesmanship would be key in selling the need for the state to supersede local land-use controls in certain cases.

"I believe he can sell big ideas to the state of California. That's his role. I believe our role is come up with some strategies that we believe we can use in support of that effort," Perata said.

Schwarzenegger administration officials declined comment, saying they had seen no formal proposal.

Representatives of local governments in the Bay Area and elsewhere throughout the state said they were against Perata's proposal on the surface but were open to listening to details once they are available.

Perata, who once served on the Alameda County Board of Supervisors, said city and county officials ultimately "buckle" under pressure from developers, worsening the linked problems of suburban sprawl, gridlock on roads and the affordability of housing.

"They are scratching each other's backs," said Perata, who is under federal investigation for alleged money-handling improprieties. "Only a damn fool would say it's not true. We could document that until the cows come home."

Experts said the average commute in California is now nearly an hour, and the median price of a home has risen to nearly $475,000.

"It's no wonder people are getting angrier and angrier," said the Senate leader, who replaced the termed-out Democratic Sen. John Burton of San Francisco. "They have to go hundreds of miles to be able to buy a home. They spend most of their time in their cars, not with their families.

"We are radically changing the lifestyle in California based upon our inability to wrestle with the problems of sprawl, congestion and affordability."

The root of the problem lies also with funding — which he hopes Schwarzenegger and the federal government will soon address — along with local government politics.

"The builders get together with the cities and they talk about what kind of changes that we're going to make," Perata said. "What they really talk about is that we'll give up on CEQA (environmental protections) a little bit and you support us on getting out from under the housing element (which guides development). Cities that want to get out from under the housing element don't want to change the way they live.

"So we have to go to some very radical things, some bold ideas. I'll say, much to the dismay of the League of California Cities, maybe we need to find those places in California where it makes a lot of sense for the state to step in and put an overlay zone," the Senate leader said.

Pat Leary, a spokeswoman for the California State Association of Counties, said local governments are opposed to the idea so far.

"It's easy to throw stones at local planners," Leary said. "But it's a pretty big hurdle to overcome, until there's more details, to say anybody in Sacramento could do a better job making decisions than local officials. It's OK to talk about reforms and another thing to talk about people hundreds of miles away making decisions for you."

Implying there's "negative and evil" relations between planners and developers is unsubstantiated, she said.

The more important factor, said Leary, is money.

"We've been talking about reforms for years now, but we need to have money first," she said.

Billions of dollars in transportation funds, in fact, have been shifted to other areas in deficit-plagued California.

But Perata said he foresees both an infusion of money and changes in the law transforming his own district, for instance.

"In the city of Oakland, there is a convergence of an interstate, the BART system, the Capitol Express train system, bus system and ferries. But there is nothing there that would indicate this is the center of a transportation hub," Perata said.

"I will guarantee you that if there was any effort to provide affordable housing, through higher density, there would be a (housing) rush like you wouldn't believe," he said.

But the responsibility to make the changes happen now lies with the governor and Legislature, Perata said. As a step toward the effort, he has combined the transportation and housing committees.

"We could pass laws up here that give people down in the communities the obligation and the responsibilities, knowing full well that they'd buckle."


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; control; landuse; perata; state; sunnemcpeak; transportation; wants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: William Creel

The planners say they are not repeating the mistakes, because they are adding architectural amenities like porches, colonades and so forth. You can put lipstick on a pig, but its still a pig.


21 posted on 01/07/2005 11:23:31 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RJL

Guess what! In the Corralitos Community Plan, for Santa Cruz County, CA, the planners have identified seismic hazard areas and want to "make people in those areas safer". Which in their minds is to MOVE THEM OUT. You see, most of the town of Corralitos is in a seismic hazard area. They want to move people out so the racoons don't have to look at electric lights or worry about crossing a street that has a car in it.


22 posted on 01/07/2005 11:27:09 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
Wasn't high-density affordable housing deemed a fairlure? I remember that they demolished almost all of them in 1990s. Why repeat the mistakes of the past?

You and I just aren't enlightened enough to understand all this.

Perata says "I will guarantee you that if there was any effort to provide affordable housing, through higher density, there would be a (housing) rush like you wouldn't believe," he said.

23 posted on 01/07/2005 11:28:18 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; NormsRevenge

Thanks....another Barf idea from a corrupt Californian politician...


24 posted on 01/07/2005 11:30:42 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RJL

What's interesting about this is, San Francisco, super liberal city in the Bay Area, are having MAJOR problems trying to get high density housing due to local NIMBYs. What Perata proposing might actually be going against SF NIMBY Liberal Elites who don't want more skyscrapers!


25 posted on 01/07/2005 11:31:36 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (Kerry will be inaugurated January 20th! I BELIEVE!!! [DUmmie taken away in a straight jacket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Guess what! In the Corralitos Community Plan, for Santa Cruz County, CA, the planners have identified seismic hazard areas and want to "make people in those areas safer". Which in their minds is to MOVE THEM OUT.

It look's like I'm becoming a regular sustainable, progressive kinda guy!

It's fun making up rules for the liberals as they constantly try to regulate us.

26 posted on 01/07/2005 11:34:34 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The planners say they are not repeating the mistakes, because they are adding architectural amenities like porches, colonades and so forth. You can put lipstick on a pig, but its still a pig.

That reminds me, if you go to that skyscraper link to the Russian forum...a lot of the new 'housing' skyscrapers for cities like Moscow and so forth...look like updated versions of the 'Commieblocks' they have everywhere. Sure, they look nicer (and probably safer due to current construction material) but they are still massive commie era apartments.

27 posted on 01/07/2005 11:35:38 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (Kerry will be inaugurated January 20th! I BELIEVE!!! [DUmmie taken away in a straight jacket])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5

The Sierra Club and the Environmental Defense fund are based in the bay area. They are actively lobbying to have the Hetch Hetchy reservoir destroyed because the subsequent lack of water and power for the SF peninsula would limit growth. They are the NIMBYs because they don't want to see any more growth in SF-- they are getting a dose of their own medicine with the wrecked freeways, difficult commutes and high housing prices.


28 posted on 01/07/2005 11:35:48 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RJL

Maybe we should get the racoons dark glasses so the lights don't bother them so much.


29 posted on 01/07/2005 11:38:18 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
from a corrupt Californian politician

Aren't they all?

30 posted on 01/07/2005 11:45:28 PM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulation. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Maybe we should get the raccoons dark glasses so the lights don't bother them so much.

LOL... Yeah, a special sunglasses tax in Hollywood to pay for them.

I think you're becoming a regular sustainable, progressive kinda guy too!

31 posted on 01/07/2005 11:45:39 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTTT!!!!!!


32 posted on 01/08/2005 3:00:38 AM PST by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"Radical, radical, radical..."

So whatever happened to the studies of laboratory rats in "high density housing" (i.e.: the "population sink")? California lawmakers set great store by lab rats when it comes to chemicals, so why not housing?

33 posted on 01/08/2005 4:04:03 AM PST by niteowl77 (Socialist: someone who can't find his ass despite using other peoples' hands in addition to his own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Many years ago, I met Sunne McPeak. All things aside; her planning efforts were pretty good back then.


34 posted on 01/08/2005 6:05:46 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alia; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; NormsRevenge; ElkGroveDan; farmfriend; calcowgirl; ...
"her planning efforts were pretty good back then."

Yup! She planned the SillyCon Valley's Dot.Commie boom and inevitable bust!!!

I don't find her presence the least bit reassuring on the Schwarzenegger largely leftist team of Demonicrat appointees!!!

35 posted on 01/08/2005 7:35:54 AM PST by SierraWasp (Moderates, are just too chicken to commit to any ideal!!! They prefer sophist sophistication...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
"from each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

Sounds almost like some sort of "manifesto" struggling to recover from "the ash-heap of history!"

36 posted on 01/08/2005 7:50:54 AM PST by SierraWasp (Moderates, are just too chicken to commit to any ideal!!! They prefer sophist sophistication...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
It ain't struggling my friend. Our California politicians have put it on the fast track to the heart of our cities so it is fully resurrected before the citizens of California find out what hit 'em
37 posted on 01/08/2005 9:09:41 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Exactly right!

We stopped their power plant plan though!


38 posted on 01/08/2005 10:00:22 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; SierraWasp; Ernest_at_the_Beach; NormsRevenge; edskid

FYI,on KSCO radio, http://www.ksco.com/ there will be a show at noon on the smart growth fraud with Dr. Michael Coffman.

If you go to the radio station page you can listen live.


39 posted on 01/08/2005 10:10:03 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
The growth they say they are against is new single family homes. They are not against cramming more people into less space to make a bucket load of money on the land they have artificially constrained.
40 posted on 01/08/2005 10:56:59 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are really stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson