To: goldstategop
Rush is right about HD: The difference is stunning. Even though I've long been a techno-freak, I had largely ignored all the hoopla over hi-def until two years ago. It was so expensive and I had a hard time envisioning how a picture could be that much better. Then I saw it. Fell in love. The difference is dramatic; just wish the programming would increase and improve at a little faster clip.
MM
47 posted on
01/07/2005 4:41:01 PM PST by
MississippiMan
(Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
To: MississippiMan
I first got my taste of HD TV when I got my DVD player on my computer two years ago and first watched a movie on my 17" monitor. The resolution was 1280 x 1024 and LOTR was strikingly better on it than on TV.
But it's not worth $1000 for a TV. I'd rather spend $550 on a 24" monitor and $400 on a computer and a TV card and watch HDTV on my PC.
69 posted on
01/07/2005 5:26:29 PM PST by
Forgiven_Sinner
("There's not another country in the world . . . that could have produced a Pat Tilman."--Ann)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson