Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Mulls Charging Web Readers
Yahoo News ^ | 1/7/2005 | Martha Graybow

Posted on 01/07/2005 12:22:35 PM PST by Born Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: YouPosting2Me
People used to pay for "Pet Rocks" so I guess they may as well try to see if people will pay for "Loose Marbles".
BWHAHAAHAHAHA!
21 posted on 01/07/2005 12:38:35 PM PST by bikepacker67 ("This is the best election night in history." -- DNC chairman Terry McAuliffe 11/2/04 8pm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (cough, cough) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA........

Um, what was this thread about again?


22 posted on 01/07/2005 12:41:12 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey
They are pretty anti when it comes to pork barrel rapid transit systems.

They are pretty anti-anything that places America's domestic priorities first.
They're merely the flip-side of the NYT's globalization mantra.
In the crossfire debate of UN vs. WTO, Main Street USA comes in last.
Neither one of those rags is worth lining a birdcage with.

23 posted on 01/07/2005 12:43:00 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

"But if they can't pay for it, then 'bloggers' won't be able to quote us anymore" spokesman for NYT /sarc

A 'sinister' plot?


24 posted on 01/07/2005 12:43:50 PM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
... we training a generation of readers to get quality information for free.

Quality information? Sez who?

25 posted on 01/07/2005 12:44:05 PM PST by Noachian (A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cubreporter
"Not me. Whenever I click onto a link and it says register or pay...I say: No way!"

I do the same.

I seem to be suffering from information overload via truthful publications as it is. ;)

26 posted on 01/07/2005 12:51:52 PM PST by G.Mason (A war mongering, UN hating, military industrial complex loving, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey
I know what you mean. They are pretty anti when it comes to pork barrel rapid transit systems.

Stop it! I can't take anymore!


27 posted on 01/07/2005 12:52:32 PM PST by rdb3 (Can I join the Pajamahadeen even if I sleep in the nude?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

I might pay for a paper I really really liked if it had an online edition.

BUT, only if they offered it as PDF FORM.

If I am going to pay dough, I want to see how it looked in print.

And frankly, it is not hard to do. We do it all the time with my college's newspaper. We design the pages in Adobe Indesign and then click "export to PDF." It is not hard at all...any idiot can do it and it does not cost anything when it is part of the page design software anyway.


28 posted on 01/07/2005 12:52:53 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
Big difference. There are actually people that will pay to read WSJ.

You got that right. What's that saying, "The people who read the NYT THINK they run the world. The people who read the WSJ DO run the world."

29 posted on 01/07/2005 12:56:16 PM PST by angry elephant (Endangered species in Seattle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

pdf papers. A good idea when I get broadband and a 52 inch high def monitor ...


30 posted on 01/07/2005 12:57:13 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The business model for the web is still evolving...the poitns made re the NY Times don't reanslate in all cases.

I subscribed to the Washington Times National Weekly for years...I loved it..great source of conservative news and views. I didn't renew it in 1999, when their website was really rnin gwell..because I got everything there, and more besides, and instantly, and FREE..I wrote the publisher a letter thanking him, explaining why I wasn't renewing, and offerign to donate my subscription cost to the paper's in-house charity..got a nice reply back discussing the evolving busiess model..

The WSJ, and Barron's..are unique.both have like 95% of sales by annual subscription..delivered to home.office..the genius was to offer the website for a reduce cost to subscribers...both publications , over the years, have saved lots of money by moving much statistical pages to the website only..indeed..it's probably a waste of time for the WSJ to print ANY stock tables now..everyone has the stuff available on line..in many different formats..the big probalem for the WSK is that much of the revenue is derived from print advertising in the papers...that doesn't translate well into the website yet....people..."read" it differentl..you can't just browse over the whole page, like you do with the paper...OTOH..if you eliminated paper, and distribution, and printing costs completely..you'd save big $$$.. Barron's should be completely on-line..but they'd lose a fortune in print ad revenue....still..it's coming soon..

31 posted on 01/07/2005 12:57:56 PM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Nice try, you can pay me but I still wouldn't read it!
These guys are getting desperate.
32 posted on 01/07/2005 12:58:38 PM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Come on NYT admit it. Michael Moore is reading your drivel free and you want him to pay.


33 posted on 01/07/2005 12:58:38 PM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

Heh, heh. :) Good line.


34 posted on 01/07/2005 1:00:16 PM PST by cubreporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Thanks for the ping. Happy New Year!

They couldn't get enough folks to pay for it. I quit buying the hard copy long ago.


35 posted on 01/07/2005 1:01:46 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

You do need broadband.

If you can't stand the scrolling, you would need a massive monitor.

But, my 17-inch handles one page at a time just fine, but at 100 percent, I can't see part of the page. I still prefer it over reading some HTML posting though.


36 posted on 01/07/2005 1:07:22 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Charge the readers..... yeah that's the ticket.

Rush does it..... why can't we.


37 posted on 01/07/2005 1:08:35 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
They can mull all they want.

If I have to "sign in" I won't read it for FREE!

38 posted on 01/07/2005 1:09:51 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

My experience leads me to prefer Mobi or MS Reader- whenever I opened PDFs on my palmtop the pages were either in scrolled windows or the type was too small to read, depending on whether I scaled it. Mobi and MS Reader automatically wrap, justify and page-number to the screen in use, which is why I use them for ebooks.

I'm really amazed that no newspapers or magazines are offering ebook versions- it's the only way to go when you commute a lot.


39 posted on 01/07/2005 1:17:29 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (With enemies like Michael Moore, who needs friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The old pink whore (formerly the old gray lady) trying to strut her suff in the free market cauldron of the internet?

LOL, this should be really rich! FRANK RICH!, that is!

SCHADENFREUDE ALERT!

40 posted on 01/07/2005 1:22:26 PM PST by Agent Smith (Fallujah delenda est. (I wish))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson