Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Puppage

Re: Bush Lawyers Target Gun Control's Legal Rationale

It is obvious that this was written by a leafiest, because they use the Marxist code words of “Although scholars long have noted the ambiguity of the 27-word amendment, courts generally have interpreted the right to "keep and bear arms" as applying not to individuals but rather to the "well-regulated militia" maintained by each state.”

The Bill of Rights (the 1st ten amendments) are for and by The People. So, your words would have one believe that that's true for all of them, EXCEPT THE SECOND AMENDMENT. The writer seems to ignore the fact that the Constitution is to RESTRICT GOVERNMENT not the PEOPLE.

The writer should have pointed out that there was no ambiguity with the Second Amendment until the Marxists started to try to restrict gun ownership. This is a trick of propagandists, to get what you want Change the Meaning of the words, re interpret what is said so as to confuse and then allow the RIGHT to be Stolen.

Now is the time for Patriots to show themselves and start attacking the Marxists who would destroy this great country, it is not time to quote their lies.
Exton


81 posted on 01/07/2005 12:05:17 PM PST by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Exton1
It is obvious that this was written by a leafiest

I don't know, I've seen leafier writers than this.

237 posted on 01/09/2005 12:03:52 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson