To: Dead Corpse
It doesn't say that the RKBA may be infringed after conviction, now does it? All it says is "shall not be infringed." Therefore, according to the fundamentalist interpretation, no one may ever lose their RKBA.
113 posted on
01/07/2005 2:20:12 PM PST by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: Chemist_Geek
Right back to argumentum absurdum. Great way to start a flame war. Not a good way to win an argument.
The Constitution also provides for due process.
Don't be more of a moron than you absolutely need to be.
117 posted on
01/07/2005 2:23:01 PM PST by
Dead Corpse
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Chemist_Geek; Dead Corpse
It doesn't say that the RKBA may be infringed after conviction, now does it? All it says is "shall not be infringed." Therefore, according to the fundamentalist interpretation, no one may ever lose their RKBA. Common sense and a little research please. " The security of a free state" part was most certainly a prevention of the SLAVES in the era from bearing arms, therefore in my FUNDAMENTALIST view, those convicted with due process, during their enslavement to the state, SHALL be infringed.
Unless of course, we Issue a 9mm upon admission to our penal facilities for an extended vacation...
203 posted on
01/07/2005 11:02:38 PM PST by
Gilbo_3
(Patience is a virtue, but it aint one of mine !!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson