Exchange posted on another thread regarding fast tracking:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1785156/posts
Public school lawyers say parents have no say if public schools teach homosexuality
World Net Daily ^ | Feb. 14, 2007
Posted on 02/14/2007 10:26:32 PM PST by SeasideSparrow
To: Kevmo
What you should demand are VOUCHERS.
WHY subsidize this ****?
Fast tracking is all fine and good but you are PAYING for this ****? Stop FUNDING IT!
66 posted on 02/15/2007 12:30:02 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
What you should demand are VOUCHERS.
***We already covered vouchers earlier in the thread. They're as neat as velcro, but not every high school kid can exercise that option TODAY. This fast tracking option can be done by almost any motivated high schooler TODAY at a low budget, to boot.
WHY subsidize this ****?
***Well, first of all, by "subsidize this ****", do you mean to replace some swear word, as in subsidize this filth? Or is it some kind of new punctuation scheme? So the question I'll answer is, "why subsidize this?" The answer is patently obvious once you look through the thread, and that is that it DOES NOT subsidize any further funding into education for the child, and in particular if a child opts out of high school, that school would LOSE its funding.
Fast tracking is all fine and good but you are PAYING for this ****? Stop FUNDING IT!
***OK, so again with the 4 star**** thingie, which I find confusing. Thanks for pointing out that fast tracking is all fine. I would urge you to read through the material because you would come to the conclusion that if a large percentage of kids were to take advantage of this approach, schools would soon see a dramatic decrease in funding. So we are NOT paying for this ****. If you really want to stop funding it, consider the fast tracking alternative as one of the means for accomplishing your goals.