Posted on 01/06/2005 7:58:45 PM PST by Kevin OMalley
Refer to post #59. It sounds like Texas is a good state for that kind of thing. Please let us know how it turns out. Good luck.
Interesting thread bump and ping.
If you live in Texas, you are in the BEST state in the union for homeschooling! Just turn around three times, click your heels together, and say "My homeschool is a private school."
That's right! In Texas, homeschools are considered private schools. As such, they are not regulated in any way by the state! (Did you know that Texas private schools are completely unregulated? I'd bet some families spending a lot of money on private schools would be surprised to know that.)
Texas law basically states that as long as your school doesn't take state money, then the state cannot tell you what to do with your school. Homeschools and private schools are treated the same.
The state constitution clearly designates state powers to public schools only. Therefore, homeschooling is protected by the state constitution and has always been legal and unregulated. That hasn't stopped some of the school districts from trying to impose upon homeschoolers, however. So, in 1987, a group of homeschooling families filed a lawsuit against the Arlington Independent School District. The result was a three-measure standard that makes a Texas homeschool legal. This standard was upheld by the Texas Supreme Court in 1994. So what's a Texas homeschool?
Bona Fide -- Education should be occurring in a good faith manner, using a... | |
Curriculum -- Formal or informal, from any source, including video and computer or internet-based instruction, and teaching the following... | |
Required Subjects -- reading, spelling, grammar, math, and good citizenship (although there is no standard as to how these subjects should be taught). |
That's it. There's no filing with the school district, no testing, no fees, no nothing!
The best part is that you are not required to prove that you are doing any of the above things! Click here to read the letter from the Commissioner of Education to the Texas school districts concerning homeschooling.
If parents are withdrawing their children from public school to teach them at home, they should "officially" withdraw the child from the school. You are not required to "get approval", sign any forms, or provide any information about your home school.
If the school hassles you, the best response is to say, "If you will submit to me in writing what you want, I'll be glad to respond, according to state law and TEA guidelines." When (if) this request is given in writing, the parent should send a simple letter of assurance. A sample is given below.:
"This letter is to assure you that we have a curriculum that covers the basic areas of reading, spelling, grammar, math and a course in good citizenship. We are pursuing it in a bona fide manner. If you have any further questions please submit them to us in writing."
Please note, that only a few schools have attempted to cause trouble for homeschooling parents. Do not go into the situation assuming you will have a difficult time. Many schools are understanding and aware of homeschooling in Texas, even if they do not necessarily agree with the choice.
You can keep as detailed or as relaxed records as you wish. If your children have college in their future, you will want to keep more detailed records for that purpose.
Speaking of older students, what about high school graduation?
Texas private schools set their own standards for graduation! That means you too. If your children plan to attend college, then take a look at what your prospective colleges require in the way of high school credits and plan accordingly. The good news is that ALL of the major colleges and universities are actively recruiting homeschoolers because they tend to do very well in college studies.
The following high school graduation plan complies with TEA standards. These are to be used as a guideline only (if you desire). For more info about homeschooling high school students, click here.
19-24 credits. Public schools base their credits on the following:
150-180 hours equals 1 credit or 1 year of study.
English/Language Arts -- 4 credits | |
Social Studies -- 3 1/2 credits World History (1), World Geography (1), US History (since reconstruction) (1), US Government (1/2) |
|
Economics -- 1/2 credit | |
Math -- 3 credits Algebra 1, Algebra 2, and Geometry. If your child's major is related to a "math field" include a 4th credit of Trig, Calculus, or other advanced math. |
|
Science -- 3 credits Biology, Chemistry, and Physics |
|
Health Education -- 1/2 credit | |
Physical Education -- 1 1/2 credits | |
Foreign Language -- 2 credits (level 1 and 2 of same language) International Sign Language is now readily accepted |
|
Fine Arts -- 1 credit | |
Speech -- 1/2 credit |
Lots more information from the site where the other information comes from:
http://www.texashomeschoolers.com/txhs.htm
My way to accelerate was to take enough AP courses so that I was able to get a BS and a Masters in 4 years of College.
A woman who taught in my school wrote a book about her experience, titled "My Posse Don't Do Homework". It became a hit movie: "Dangerous Minds" with Michelle Pfeiffer.
----
That sounds like a curse - "may you end up in a school that is fodder for a Hollywood movie".
Hollywood would never make a movie about the modest Christian private school that ably teaches our children (in 2nd and 4th grade now) the basics in reading, writing, math, etc., Bible, in a good environment. The only thing Hollywood would find interesting is that there are children from many ethnic backgounds; ah, but almost all are from Christian homes.
Um, not quite:
Conservatives are good on issues like the death penalty and taxes and drug laws and freedom of speech issues and foreign policy and Government spending and separation of church and state and how much say the men in black should have on such matters.
Liberals are good on issues like ... dog leash laws and neighborhood recycling programs. NOTHING MORE.
I'm aware of the AP path, they had some of those classes in my high school. The quality of each program varies from school to school. But it doesn't really make as much sense as outright skipping 4 years of drudgery and getting on with the real work ahead.
One kid I knew took enough courses to supposedly qualify with sophomore standing when he graduated, assuming he passed all of the challenge tests. But if he had spent 4 years working at a college level he would have had much more than sophomore standing.
If you got a Masters & Bachelors & High School in 8 years, think of what you could have accomplished if you could have started college earlier.
For a typical advanced kid, those extra 3 years of schooling are difficult to swallow, and even just looking at starting salaries (with no raises), one would be $90k ahead of one's peers at a starting salary of $30k. If half of that $90k were put into savings, the kid might have over $300k in 30 years.
http://partners.financenter.com/choosetosave/calculate/us-eng/savings02.fcs
Amount you have invested $45000
Your savings rate % 4
Additional deposits $ 10,000
Yearly
Years invested 30
Your federal tax rate 25.00 %
Your state tax rate 6.80 %
Inflation rate 3.0%
In 30 years, your investment will be worth $330,376.
That's just looking at it from the financial side. The kid would certainly also bypass 4 years worth of liberal lunacy, which is worth more than $300k in my book.
"I'm aware of the AP path, they had some of those classes in my high school. The quality of each program varies from school to school. But it doesn't really make as much sense as outright skipping 4 years of drudgery and getting on with the real work ahead. "
One way it makes sense is financially, ie, if you cant afford college. I got 26 credits, effectively a year of college, at a competitive school, and I didnt have to pay any tuition for it. My family couldnt afford to pay much for my college.
The other thing to do is to simply skip the lower grades, so you graduate younger without necessarily dropping out. e.g.
I graduated at age 17, having taken advanced calculus (BC), AP physics, AP chemisty, AP history, AP english, AP french, by then.
"If you got a Masters & Bachelors & High School in 8 years, think of what you could have accomplished if you could have started college earlier."
Doing that much was geeky enough, accelerating further might have been better financially on a spreadsheet, but it can leave you socially 'underdeveloped'. I was overloading on studies as it was and while I'm smart I'm no Steven Hawking.
Looking back, I got enough out of high school that I wouldnt want to skip them ... rather, I'd skip 8th grade.
Doing that much was geeky enough, accelerating further might have been better financially on a spreadsheet, but it can leave you socially 'underdeveloped'.
***I keep hearing that and I think it's just plain untrue. Some of the source material posted in this thread directly contraverts that claim. As far as I can tell, it's an old wives' tale relied upon to keep kids in underperforming schools.
Looking back, I got enough out of high school that I wouldnt want to skip them ... rather, I'd skip 8th grade.
***I would skip that year as well. When I was told about the CHSPE, I spent 3 days thinking about it and then made my decision, and quit going to high school right then. I was in the local community college the next semester. When you look at it that way, I only willingly spent about 3 days at high school. I do feel strongly that kids should be given a choice for themselves. There's nothing more "socially developed" than a person who exercises a choice and takes on a more challenging course than the path currently provided.
I'm struck by how much of what is required in high school is forced to be retaken in college.
19-24 credits. Public schools base their credits on the following:
150-180 hours equals 1 credit or 1 year of study. English/Language Arts -- 4 credits
***Partially building on writing skills but English is still a requirement.
Social Studies -- 3 1/2 credits
***Waste of time, required to take again in college.
World History (1), World Geography (1), US History (since reconstruction) (1), US Government (1/2)
***Waste of time, required to take again in college.
Economics -- 1/2 credit
***Interesting. I don't think that's a requirement in most colleges.
Math -- 3 credits
Algebra 1, Algebra 2, and Geometry. If your child's major is related to a "math field" include a 4th credit of Trig, Calculus, or other advanced math.
***I'm glad to see this requirement getting pushed. Many folks freak out in college when they see that Trig is going to be a requirement. I don't think this stuff is a waste of time, even though the expression is true: "you'll hardly ever use algebra in real life".
Science -- 3 credits
Biology, Chemistry, and Physics
***No waste of time here.
Health Education -- 1/2 credit
***Waste of time, required to take again in college.
Physical Education -- 1 1/2 credits
***Waste of time, required to take again in college.
Foreign Language -- 2 credits (level 1 and 2 of same language)
***One of the only things that actually counts towards credits in California. Not necessarily a waste of time.
International Sign Language is now readily accepted
***Fascinating
Fine Arts -- 1 credit
***Probably a waste of time.
Speech -- 1/2 credit
******Partially building on a skillset but speech is still a requirement in college. Certainly a strong skill to develop for career building.
By my count, that's about 7 units of credit/time wasted, more than a thousand hours that could be recouped just by taking the same courses at a college level.
From another thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1361554/posts?page=65#65
Good response, ladylib...
To: ladylib
"Homeschool them and let them go to college when they're 14. "
***I agree with homeschooling, but not everyone has the wherewithal to do it. What is your provision for those who can't afford it, other than the standard browbeating of parents that they don't care enough for their children? Here's an example thread:
On the 'sin' of sending kids to public school
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1362311/posts
Interestingly, your prior response in #30 contains the seeds of the conundrum that kids face today, namely that the moment they can pass the equivalency test they are wasting their time in high school.
Thread 30: "More schools are also shifting attention to the standardized testing or the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment tests."
Ladylib: I think this is the real reason. Gotta study for those high-stakes tests, and the more academic courses you take, the better you'll do.
With your permission, I'd like to copy your response over on my other thread.
64 posted on 03/17/2005 5:42:56 PM PST by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
Bill Gates has declared American high schools "obsolete."
Public education isn't preparing teens
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1367344/posts?page=22#22
The Washington Times ^ | 3-21-05 | Michael Smith
Posted on 03/21/2005 11:12:45 AM PST by JZelle
Bill Gates has declared American high schools "obsolete." In a Feb. 26 speech to the National Education Summit on High Schools, he said "our high schools even when they're working exactly as designed cannot teach our kids what they need to know today." These criticisms are not new, but the fact that America's most successful businessman is concerned about how America will survive in a world that requires educated workers should cause people to take notice. Mr. Gates went on to say he was "terrified for our work force of tomorrow."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20050320-092252-1935r.htm
Hi Dawn53:
That was a good post over at that other thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1399251/posts
Skipped gym class costs student diploma
Times Leader/AP Wire ^ | 5/8/2005
Posted on 05/08/2005 6:47:15 PM PDT by Born Conservative
BOW, N.H. - A decision to take Advanced Placement biology instead of gym will cost a Bow High School senior her diploma, but it won't keep her from going to college in the fall.
Though Isabel Gottlieb is a good student, a trumpet player in the school band and holds varsity letters in three sports, she discovered last fall she was one gym class shy of having enough credits to graduate next month.....
Well said on another thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1433891/posts?page=35#4
Voucher: Solution or Flawed Compromise ?
FEE ^ | 6/30/05 | Robert Parker
To: cinives
The answer is to require very limited testing twice a year for any student's school to receive the payment (and allow an option of only testing once a year, if the school is willing to wait a whole year to get any payment). Testing should be limited to math, reading/spelling/vocabulary/grammar, facts-only physical science, and possibly some very basic facts-only material on how government works (like the existence of federal and state senates and houses of representatives, governors, a President, etc. -- since a huge number of public school grads haven't a clue about this stuff). No room for political or religious issues, keep the tests to between 1-2 hours depending on age/grade level, and keep the questions and grading to a strictly right-or-wrong answer format. Have the tests administered at many convenient locations, administered by people who have no vested interest in the economics of the system, and who have no information about which students are attending which schools.
Set the standards to approximately the current 50th percentile of public school students, and once kids pass the twelfth grade level (even if they do it when they're 10 years old, which wouldn't be uncommon for a lot homeschooled kids), let them get their vouchers until they're 18, without any further testing. This system would allow homeschoolers, and little neighborhood private schools run by a mom or grand-dad or whoever in somebody's kitchen, to get the money for getting a minimum of the same job done that the public schools currently get done. Most would obviously do a lot more, but this would at least eliminate the need to limit vouchers to large schools which get inspected and regulated by the government, and would eliminate flat-out fraud by "home schools" or "private schools" which are doing nothing at all but pocketing the money (as is the case with a lot of federally funded adult vocational schools now).
4 posted on 06/30/2005 9:02:55 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
"Set the standards to approximately the current 50th percentile of public school students, and once kids pass the twelfth grade level (even if they do it when they're 10 years old, which wouldn't be uncommon for a lot homeschooled kids), let them get their vouchers until they're 18, without any further testing."
***I agree. We have been discussing inexpensive ways to fast track kids through high school to avoid the liberal agenda and other idiocies:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1315730/posts?page=84#84
Unfortunately my thread title was not well thought out, because some parents might instinctively skip over it due to attached stigma, whether real or imagined.
20 posted on 06/30/2005 4:51:46 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
To: Kevin OMalley
Interesting approach. I think a lot of homeschoolers do essentially that. Homeschool entirely through 8th grade, and then phase in community college courses and/or individual high school courses in school districts which allow that.
Another important issue, though, is the huge numbers of kids who just shouldn't be doing high school or college academic work at the traditional age. We're spending colossal amounts of education for kids in the 14-22 age range, which is a time when most them really care about nothing that isn't driven by hormones and/or lack of life experience. Except for the small minority who are really academically self-motivated at that age, they'd be better off doing something like working at McDonald's, and maybe taking one course at a time that meets 2-3 times a week, until such time as they are serious about pursuing education.
It's a horribly common pattern in the U.S. that young people totally waste their time in high school and college, while taxpayers and parents are footing the huge bill for the illusion that they are "studying" full time. Then when they reach their mid 20s or early 30s or whenever they get a clue, they'd really like to do it all over again and get a serious education that will land them good and steady employment, but the money's all been spent and nobody's offering them a free ride anymore, now that they're really serious about studying.
21 posted on 06/30/2005 6:44:39 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
I posted this to Kevin last night and he asked me to post it on the this thread.
"My kid used the dual credit program at our local state college to fast track. So now he's entering his senior year of HS (17 years old) and completing his AA requirements this term (he needs 3 more hours) and can use the rest of the available credit hours this year (you can take 15 per term) to work toward requirements for his major. It's a wonderful program...and the fact that it's tuition free doesn't hurt. Won't need a GED, since he's homeschooled, I just have to turn in a statement that he has "graduated HS" and he will be awarded an AA at the end of this year which will technically be his sr. year in HS.
Then he can transfer to a 4 year program next year to complete his bachelors, he'll be a junior, and if he stays on track should have his bachelors about the time he turns 20. In our opinion, the good thing about this program (other than the fact that it's free tuition) is that more and more a Master's is needed to secure a good position, and by graduating college at 20, you can go ahead and attain your Masters, still graduating at the same time you would have normally been graduating from college."
Thanks, dawn53. You were the 3rd one to respond to this thread! I'm so glad for your son. Hopefully more will find encouragement in his story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.