Posted on 01/06/2005 2:18:57 PM PST by rightalien
You are correct. But I think the Bush girls like the guy, so they've invited him. I hope he behaves.
Gee, shame we can't o back the 'good ol' days' with Bubba Clinton, the Oral Office, and all that, eh?
I am amazed that you don't support abortion. Maybe there is some hope for you.
Could you actually dispute my points rather than dismissing them?
Besides, is Oly Snowe going to the inauguration? McCain? Arlen Spectre?!?!?
So why not stand AGAINST them since they all vote against us, and at least Kid Rock voted WITH us for W!!!!
Watch out your statement might earn you some nasty freepmail from some of the more zealous... I mean values oriented Freepers around here.
But that's only because they're interested in special rights.... errr I mean concessions for their interest....
That's exactly right, they wanted to invite them! Bwahahahahahaha - I take comfort in your discomfort.
OMG.
See, that's the problem - you think that anyone that doesn't subscribe to your version of morality is totally depraved or "scum".
Just let others live their lives and you live yours.
Smiling here in N.Y. Yes, his 'heart is right'
Oh, I think the Bush girls should themselves cancel this crap.
Besides, they should invite Barbara Boxer and challenger her to a duel w/ one of them!
Yeah, I was astounding by how weak the response was too. Maybe one day, he'll actually address the points people make in their posts.
Yes this board is just so full of those types, and I bet that everyone that doesn't share your opinion or viewpoint on something must be that type.....
The only fighting your wide arse does is amoungst republicans, behind the cover of a computer screen.
You mean like have an abortion if they want to?
How about if they decide to marry their dog?
.You see there are some rules we all must obey. I think the fewer the better, but then even when I think people have the right to do wrong it still doesn't mean it is right. It also means I have the right to not approve of it.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if you were that type.
"Do you not know how a democratic republic works? If you don't it would take far too long and someone with much more patience than I to teach you."
Pretty funny - please oh please tell me how a democratic republic works... I guess poor lil o' me don't know nuthin' 'bout no republics and gubment. The "funny" thing is I spend a lot of my time talking to former Soviets who long for the Communist system. They are about as tolerant of "dissenting" views as some on this forum. And it's also a good explanation for why the "new" Communist Party in Russia has almost no support among the younger generations. They denounce anything that they see as "not moral" or "scum" - i.e., anyone who disagrees with them. Rock-n-Roll, dancing, partying, freedom of expression, free thought - somehow to them it's unpatriotic, vile, disgusting. What they don't understand is the Russian youth still remain patriotic, love their country, support their government, but somehow manage to enjoy the things that the older generation do not. That's why that party has atrophied. Didn't learn the trick of evolving.... There's a lesson to be learned here... The Republican party needs to have a foothold in the modern culture, shape it from within - it's a lot harder to shape something from the outside, especially if you have such an intolerance of youthful fads -doesn't bode well for the future of the GOP...
And btw, the "common opinion" did NOT decide that the drinking age should be raised - the government did. Now, of course, we voted the government in, but as I recall most did not run on the "we'll raise the age" platform.
As I told him it would take too long. With you there would be no point in even trying.
Huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.