Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alessandrofiaschi
Well... Adam Smith or Thomas Malthus were not considered as economists at their time.

Besides, even Adam Smith outlined situations under which he considered tariffs to be appropriate:

Excerpted and condensed from:

Adam Smith: The Wealth of Nations, Book 4, Chapter 2

Of Restraints upon the Importation from Foreign Countries
of such Goods as can be produced at Home

"There seem, however, to be two cases in which it will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign for the encouragement of domestic industry...

  • The first is, when some particular sort of industry is necessary for the defence of the country....

  • The second case, in which it will generally be advantageous to lay some burden upon foreign for the encouragement of domestic industry is, when some tax is imposed at home upon the produce of the latter. In this case, it seems reasonable that an equal tax should be imposed upon the like produce of the former....

In today's society, the economic burdens placed on domestic industries by the federal regulatory bureaucracy (EPA, OSHA, etc.) essentially constitute a tax. For this reason, it is valid to place a tariff on imported goods to compensate for the uneven playing field established by domestic regulations.
48 posted on 01/06/2005 2:40:52 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green

Very good! I'm not against "Restraints upon the Importation", but to subsidies to certain sector (agriculture etc.) and our domestic Tax System.


52 posted on 01/06/2005 3:05:57 PM PST by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson