Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran boosts air defenses at nuke sites
Jerusalem Post ^ | Jan. 6, 2005

Posted on 01/06/2005 9:21:30 AM PST by IAF ThunderPilot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
......Destroy the SAMs first, then smash the nuke sites......
1 posted on 01/06/2005 9:21:30 AM PST by IAF ThunderPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Convert from ECUSA; Laffalot; SJackson; Alouette; SirLurkedalot; yonif; anotherview

Iranwatch alert!


2 posted on 01/06/2005 9:22:05 AM PST by IAF ThunderPilot (The basic point of the Israel Defence Forces: -Israel cannot afford to lose a single war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

Maybe it is time for a showdown with these power-crazy whackos. I don't think they will be allowed to 'nuke-up'. Justice will come in the middle of the night...on wings!!!

Did someone say F-117 ???


3 posted on 01/06/2005 9:24:12 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

"Just take the top 50 pilots you have, attach them the best fighters you have, and rock the place"


4 posted on 01/06/2005 9:25:52 AM PST by IAF ThunderPilot (The basic point of the Israel Defence Forces: -Israel cannot afford to lose a single war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

Wonderful! Majority of their air defense forces are now centrally located. Talk about your opportunities!


5 posted on 01/06/2005 9:27:59 AM PST by odoso (Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

Israel will not be within their nuke missile range immediately, but Iraq, for example, will be. The idea that an Iranian nuke is not a big worry is itself worrisome. You can see the half measures that are going to leave Iran as a nuclear power. And if we don't attack before it can use a nuke, how are we going to attack after? And we say the U.S. will not lead a military effort? Unless Israel is planning to do the job later, I say nuke the nuke sites and do it very soon.


6 posted on 01/06/2005 9:30:01 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

Those UFOs heehee...


7 posted on 01/06/2005 9:31:13 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot
"Iran has beefed up its air defenses around various nuclear sites...."

Isn't that why we put nuclear warheads on cruise missles?

8 posted on 01/06/2005 9:31:36 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot
"Given that the intrusion of enemy aircraft over Iran's airspace is possible, all fighter jets of the country have been ordered by the army chief to shoot them down in the event of sighting them," he was quoted as saying.

Being ordered to do so, and able, are 2 separate things.

9 posted on 01/06/2005 9:32:23 AM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

India rejected Iran's demand for a radar system pretty much soon after it was requested,about 3-4 months back.

I think they have probably purchased corresponding systems from the Chinese.


10 posted on 01/06/2005 9:46:00 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Does the US have any cruise missiles(other than the ALCM) deployed with nukes??I thought most nuclear cruise missiles were disarmed & converted to the conventional strike role.Though the Tomahawk & the ALCM are still technically capable of carrying nukes.


11 posted on 01/06/2005 9:48:09 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IAF ThunderPilot

We should thank them -- such a move merely helps confirm the importance of the targets.


12 posted on 01/06/2005 9:49:26 AM PST by SunkenCiv (the US population in the year 2100 will exceed a billion, perhaps even three billion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
"I thought most nuclear cruise missiles were disarmed & converted to the conventional strike role....."

"Um, oh yeah, right - we, um, disarmed them all. Yeah, that's right, we don't have any more. We're reducing our nuclear arsenal, yeah, that's the ticket....."

Hello my Israeli friend. That was from an American comedian skit - the character is "the liar" (John Lovitz - Hebrew, no?).
Technicaly we may have - just like our B-2 Bombers are no longer nuclear capable......

13 posted on 01/06/2005 9:55:44 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States

If there pilots are anything like Saddams' was during the gulf war, our boys don't have anything to worry about, if it comes down to a 'dog fight'.


14 posted on 01/06/2005 9:56:33 AM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I'm thinking it's countdown time. Iran has thumbed it's nose in our direction long enough. It sure would be a shame if most of their reactors had 'accidents' sometime in the near future.


15 posted on 01/06/2005 9:59:19 AM PST by highnoon (Can anyone give me directions to the Lost Highway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Tomahawk Cruise Missile

The Tomahawk long range, subsonic cruise missile can attack targets on land (Tomahawk Land Attack Missile (TLAM)) and at sea (Tomahawk Anti-Ship Missile (TASM)). The TLAM can be fitted with either conventional unitary warhead (TLAM\C), nuclear warhead (TLAM\N) or submunition dispenser (TLAM\D). On 27 September 1991 President Bush announced a number of initiatives affecting the entire spectrum of US nuclear weapons. The United States removed all tactical nuclear weapons, including nuclear cruise missiles, from its surface ships and attack submarines. The nuclear equiped UGM-109A TLAM-N Tomahawk was withdrawn from service in 1992, though conventional versions remain operational.

16 posted on 01/06/2005 9:59:30 AM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
An Islamic nuke in the hand or Iranian mullahs is not an option. If we dont deal with them soon Israel will.
Or they might beat us to it, or join us.
I thought Iran had the bomb a while back when they talked as if they did.
But that must have been a bluff as the mullahs are still alive. They would be wise to dismantle their program, but they are not wise.
17 posted on 01/06/2005 10:15:06 AM PST by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

bump


18 posted on 01/06/2005 10:19:55 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: highnoon

[singing] "ka-boom! ka-boom! ya-da-da-da-da-da ya-da-da-da-da-da..."


19 posted on 01/06/2005 10:21:04 AM PST by SunkenCiv (the US population in the year 2100 will exceed a billion, perhaps even three billion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

It'd be a great way to test out the new F-22's.


20 posted on 01/06/2005 10:26:23 AM PST by T.Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson