Okay Einstein, what would you be saying now if we kept the army together, and all the subversives within would occasionally slaughter our forces. I assume you would have allowed the army to keep its weapons? If not, what good would an army without weapons be? Maybe a little more thought would show how rediculous these MSM pimps and politicians rea at being monday morning QBs
I'm jumping in without having read this thread all the way through, because I've had it with this dem talking point. My fiance was on Franks' staff during the run into Bagdhad. He says this is a red herring...this "keeping the Iraqi army together" bs....the "Army" was either decimated or they all took the uniforms off and ran home. There was NO army to keep together.
Dem talking point, dem talking point, dem talking point....