Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Reports: Up to 6 other Sentors may join Barbara Boxer in contesting the election.

Posted on 01/06/2005 7:20:07 AM PST by Next_Time_NJ

MSNBC is now reporting that up to 6 other senators (1 possible republican) will give statements of support for contesting the election. There were no names given. Barbara Boxer is confirmed to be the only senator on record to say she is now going to contest the election along with Conyers and a few others from congress.

The report went on to say that the debate (if all 6 come on board) will only be about 30 minutes, due to the 5 minute rule per senator. The report also said that Bush's victory his not in jepordy.

I still think the media may eat crow on this but anyone have any thoughts?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boxer; breaking; contest; conyers; election; kerrydefeat; objection; rats; rinos; specter; spector; spectorrector
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-275 next last
To: OXENinFLA
Here are the rules...


U.S. Code
TITLE 3
CHAPTER 1

§ 15. Counting electoral votes in Congress

Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State. But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.

§ 16. Same; seats for officers and Members of two Houses in joint meeting

At such joint meeting of the two Houses seats shall be provided as follows: For the President of the Senate, the Speaker’s chair; for the Speaker, immediately upon his left; the Senators, in the body of the Hall upon the right of the presiding officer; for the Representatives, in the body of the Hall not provided for the Senators; for the tellers, Secretary of the Senate, and Clerk of the House of Representatives, at the Clerk’s desk; for the other officers of the two Houses, in front of the Clerk’s desk and upon each side of the Speaker’s platform. Such joint meeting shall not be dissolved until the count of electoral votes shall be completed and the result declared; and no recess shall be taken unless a question shall have arisen in regard to counting any such votes, or otherwise under this subchapter, in which case it shall be competent for either House, acting separately, in the manner hereinbefore provided, to direct a recess of such House not beyond the next calendar day, Sunday excepted, at the hour of 10 o’clock in the forenoon. But if the counting of the electoral votes and the declaration of the result shall not have been completed before the fifth calendar day next after such first meeting of the two Houses, no further or other recess shall be taken by either House.

§ 17. Same; limit of debate in each House

When the two Houses separate to decide upon an objection that may have been made to the counting of any electoral vote or votes from any State, or other question arising in the matter, each Senator and Representative may speak to such objection or question five minutes, and not more than once; but after such debate shall have lasted two hours it shall be the duty of the presiding officer of each House to put the main question without further debate.

§ 18. Same; parliamentary procedure at joint meeting

While the two Houses shall be in meeting as provided in this chapter, the President of the Senate shall have power to preserve order; and no debate shall be allowed and no question shall be put by the presiding officer except to either House on a motion to withdraw.




Get it on!


221 posted on 01/06/2005 9:42:46 AM PST by michigander (The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: valleygal
It was a sarcastic guess.
222 posted on 01/06/2005 9:43:19 AM PST by KJacob (If I yawn it is only in anticipation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Free and fair; All

You mean revote the whole presidental race.. No way. Bush won fair and square.. However, there is a valid case for a revote in Washington...


223 posted on 01/06/2005 9:45:59 AM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: KJacob

.


224 posted on 01/06/2005 9:46:35 AM PST by kimmie7 (Seems these days the weatherman should start the forecast with, "Turn to the book of Revelation...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Free and fair
If everything was free and fair, why is anybody objecting? And why would we object to another free and fair election?

Why should we have a revote if they can't prove any fraud occurred? Just to be "nice"?
225 posted on 01/06/2005 9:48:26 AM PST by KJC1 (George Soros is fugly inside and out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: sola_fide

Not a chance in hell.

He may be a mushy moderate, but until hell freezes over, he would not sign onto this.

It is Chafee.


226 posted on 01/06/2005 9:49:29 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

A Specter on the horizon?....


227 posted on 01/06/2005 9:50:05 AM PST by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
Now Tubbs Jones is saying people came up to her saying their vote didn't get counted.

How would they know? Voting's anonymous in Ohio just like everywhere else.

228 posted on 01/06/2005 9:50:16 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ

this story is back-of-the-page stuff on the CNN and MSNBC websites.


229 posted on 01/06/2005 9:51:00 AM PST by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

It's not John McCain...I'd bet money. I got to hear him speak before the President at Bank One Ballpark after the third debate. I can't imagine someone saying, "This is a good man." and then turn around and stab him in the back.

I have mixed feelings about McCain. He sometimes drives me nuts but whenever I hear him speak here at home on KFYI, he comes across well and has kept the promises he's made, not switching parties (last year, anyway, LOL) and not taking the VP spot with Kerry.


230 posted on 01/06/2005 9:51:40 AM PST by valleygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Howlin

They are all heading over to the house for a joint session

Is there a Live Thread on this??


231 posted on 01/06/2005 9:53:37 AM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Regicide

Great email!!


232 posted on 01/06/2005 9:53:54 AM PST by geedee (History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Howlin

PUT ON C-SPAN1 NOW!!!

BOXER IS TALKING


233 posted on 01/06/2005 9:55:11 AM PST by Mo1 (Does the distinguished Sen from VT wish to act as our treaty rep. for negotiations with Al Queda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
The dims are destabilizing the whole process by mounting endless phony claims.

The Dims actually don't want to have (free) elections at all. This is just a step in the process of getting there.

234 posted on 01/06/2005 9:55:58 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ

It's a long thread and it may have already been said. This session is not about the people of OHio or their vote. IT IS ABOUT THE ELECTORAL VOTES!


235 posted on 01/06/2005 9:56:03 AM PST by granite (DUFU Fan - A DUmmie linked to this thread so I hijacked it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nina0113
How would they know? Voting's anonymous in Ohio just like everywhere else.

Probably because they are "special" and they "feel" it, so it must be true. /sarc
236 posted on 01/06/2005 9:56:51 AM PST by KJC1 (George Soros is fugly inside and out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin

Can you start a live thread if Howlin can't? I'm speakerless in my cube & dying to know what's happening.


237 posted on 01/06/2005 9:57:43 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ

1917 all over again.


238 posted on 01/06/2005 9:58:12 AM PST by chronotrigger (I hate the BC$!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Next_Time_NJ

Is this one of those deals where 5 or 6 senators agree to object to something in the cloak room....and then they backout after they get the first idiot (Boxer) to go on-record?


239 posted on 01/06/2005 10:01:16 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
The Boxer Rebellion

I've said it more than once...

DU = Moronic Convergence.

240 posted on 01/06/2005 10:03:06 AM PST by valleygal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-275 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson