Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pittsburg Phil
That's not science; it's bulls**t

Also, since it doesn't address how life began and ultimately creates more questions than it answers, why the controversy? It's really a boring little pseudoscience when you think about it. I wonder why the supporters spend so much time defending it?

22 posted on 01/05/2005 3:40:21 PM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo (The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Michael_Michaelangelo

The evolutionists 'creation story' and 'creator' are a source of tremendous embarrassment:

"in the beginning there was 'something or other' and in this 'something or other' there happened to be some non-lifebearing, unintelligent and purposeless matter of unknown origins floating around and somehow or another the bits of matter collided and then somehow or another created the heavens, earth, and all life."

As you said......this leaves LOTS of questions. Not only that,but in order to believe their fairytale, we must be willing to step through the looking glass.


25 posted on 01/06/2005 5:07:30 AM PST by Lindykim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson