Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: annyokie
Its story is preposterous. It reports the final stages of a final conflict (locale: chiefly the United States, some indefinite years hence) between the harried ranks of free enterprise and the "looters." These are proponents of proscriptive taxes, government ownership, labor, etc., etc.

It seems Chambers had quite a bit of sympathy for the "looters".

Since a great many of us dislike much that Miss Rand dislikes, quite as heartily as she does, many incline to take her at her word. It is the more persuasive, in some quarters, because the author deals wholly in the blackest blacks and the whitest whites. In this fiction everything, everybody, is either all good or all bad, without any of those intermediate shades which, in life, complicate reality and perplex the eye that seeks to probe it truly.

Translation - Chambers did not think that socialism was all bad. Further only the ignorant see socialism vs private property rights as a black vs white issue.

According to Chambers a little bit of socialism is OK - right there in the gray area otherwise known as the mushy middle.

135 posted on 01/05/2005 6:13:38 PM PST by NMC EXP (Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NMC EXP

Bigot. Read up on Chambers. If Miss Rand had stuck by her "principles" I might be able to take her seriously. At least Whittaker admitted he had been wrong-------something you will never see in print that Ayn did.


138 posted on 01/05/2005 6:24:58 PM PST by annyokie (If the shoe fits, put 'em both on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson