Why did this omission have to be defended? Who would have benefitted by its inclusion?
Here's Daniel Okrent's defense of why the New York Times omitted the fact that Susan Sontag was a lesbian:
Why did this omission have to be defended? Who would have benefitted by its inclusion?
- -- --- ----- -0-----
Since when did reporting facts required a determination of benefit? Answer since the issue is homosexual behavior and the reporter is probably a homosexual.