Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw
Here's Daniel Okrent's defense of why the New York Times omitted the fact that Susan Sontag was a lesbian:

Why did this omission have to be defended? Who would have benefitted by its inclusion?

16 posted on 01/05/2005 9:39:19 AM PST by scouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: scouse

Here's Daniel Okrent's defense of why the New York Times omitted the fact that Susan Sontag was a lesbian:

Why did this omission have to be defended? Who would have benefitted by its inclusion?
- -- --- ----- -0-----

Since when did reporting facts required a determination of benefit? Answer since the issue is homosexual behavior and the reporter is probably a homosexual.


25 posted on 01/05/2005 10:53:59 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson