Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Bans a Large-Caliber Gun, and the Battle Is On
NY Times ^ | January 4, 2005 | CAROLYN MARSHALL

Posted on 01/04/2005 9:21:49 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Peter DaSilva for The New York Times
"They keep chipping away a little at a time," Michael Fournier, gun dealer, said of gun control advocates. "Eventually they'll try to get them all."

Peter DaSilva for The New York Times
A .50-caliber rifle at Mr. Fournier's shop, the Gun Exchange in San Jose, Calif., two days before a disputed state law took effect.

1 posted on 01/04/2005 9:21:49 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I heard these things were selling like crazy right after they signed the bill to ban it. Due to the fact of course that after January first, it will be illegal, and the idea of owning something that is now illegal, legally must've appealed to a lot of people.


2 posted on 01/04/2005 9:26:00 PM PST by Simmy2.5 (Kerry has been relieved of duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"It's a military-type weapon," Ms. Carbaugh said of the .50 BMG, "and he believes the gun presents a clear and present danger to the general public."

Nonsense, these arrogant politicos view the gun as a clear and present danger to them, because its bullets can pierce bulletproof limos--their vehicles of choice--to keep them from touching us Great Unwashed.

The only thing between me and one of these beauties is $8,500, and believe me, if I had the dough, there would be one in my safe--there's room.

3 posted on 01/04/2005 9:30:40 PM PST by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It fires bullets five and a half inches long

That would be something I like to see.. and no, I would not shoot it. :)

4 posted on 01/04/2005 9:31:42 PM PST by killjoy (My kid is the bomb at Islam Elementary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5
Man... i wish i could have bought one to add to the collection before they banned it. :( I spent my money on this badboy the other day though: Springfield 9mm. NRA's gun of the year in 2004.
5 posted on 01/04/2005 9:35:17 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Let's see:

1. Libs say more guns make the country more unsafe.

2. Therefore, since more people then ever own guns, we should be seeing skyrocketing crime, particularly murder.

3. Yet, the latest stats from all major cities show murder rates (and most other violent crimes) are down SIGNIFICANTLY! In fact, some are the lowest in over 20 years.

4. So the stats show that more guns do NOT equal a more lawless society.

Of course, don't expect libs to agree to this. Remember: To liberals it is not the facts that count, it is their impression of the world and HOW things SHOULD be done that counts, even if these beliefs fly in the face of facts.

6 posted on 01/04/2005 9:36:51 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"It's a military-type weapon," Ms. Carbaugh said of the .50 BMG, "and he believes the gun presents a clear and present danger to the general public."

You can take the boy out of Austria, but you can't take the Austria out of the boy.

7 posted on 01/04/2005 9:40:04 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Where the hell do you start with this crap?????

California has become the first state to ban a powerful .50-caliber long-range rifle that gun control advocates portray as a military firearm that could easily fall into the hands of terrorists bent on assassination or shooting down an airplane.

It's a single shot for Christ sake. You could get a handgun and sit at the end of a runway and get off more shots at a plane than this could cycle. Lots more folks have been murdered with a .22 calliber than a BMG.
8 posted on 01/04/2005 9:40:16 PM PST by pennyfarmer (A whole lotta people need some killin. (Not the babies))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer

To be accurate.... a .50 cal rifle has NEVER been used in a murder in Californias history.


9 posted on 01/04/2005 9:42:11 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
California has become the first state to ban a powerful .50-caliber long-range rifle

Excuse me, but California didn't ban this perfectly legitimate firearm without the signature of the Great RINO of All Time: Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Never lose sight of that fact.

10 posted on 01/04/2005 9:47:17 PM PST by Prime Choice (The DNC! Where boys and girls look the same! That's a little strange isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Dem

Spot on, Auntie! Well said.


11 posted on 01/04/2005 9:47:34 PM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All; Pookie

12 posted on 01/04/2005 9:49:55 PM PST by Prime Choice (The DNC! Where boys and girls look the same! That's a little strange isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

Yeah... but it was either Arnold or Bustamante. McClintock didn't have a chance of winning the recall. I picked the lesser of the two.


Plus after meeting Arnold at CSULB during his campaign, it sealed the deal for me.


13 posted on 01/04/2005 9:53:45 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"the law is intended to help keep the weapon out of the hands of "terrorists, general nut cases and survivalists," Mr. Koretz said"

Who does he want to have them, death cults?

14 posted on 01/04/2005 9:54:43 PM PST by TERMINATTOR ("I believe in background checks at gun shows or anywhere" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew LB
Yeah... but it was either Arnold or Bustamante.

That doesn't excuse Ahhnold's selling out the GOP (again). Besides, that Arnold-or-Bustamante crap is so 2003. Spare me.

15 posted on 01/04/2005 9:55:30 PM PST by Prime Choice (The DNC! Where boys and girls look the same! That's a little strange isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

A pox on (R)nulled, and the back stabbing Republicans.


16 posted on 01/04/2005 9:58:15 PM PST by TERMINATTOR ("I believe in background checks at gun shows or anywhere" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer

If they were all that concerned about terrorism, the more rational thing to do would be to ban box cutters!!


17 posted on 01/04/2005 10:00:14 PM PST by midnightson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
California has become the first state to ban a powerful .50-caliber long-range rifle

How long until they start banning .30 caliber "long range rifles"?

18 posted on 01/04/2005 10:01:03 PM PST by Mulder (“The spirit of resistance is so valuable, that I wish it to be always kept alive" Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

While i'm not happy with this gun ban.... i'm a little less happy over Bush's immigration policy with Mexico. Which is a much larger threat to our freedom than a rarely owned/bought .50 cal rifle.


19 posted on 01/04/2005 10:01:41 PM PST by Andrew LB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The writer of the article, this Carolyn Marshall, contributes more misrepresentation.
The "bullets" are not five and one half inches long,
for crying out loud. The assembled cartridge, shell casing plus projectile (bullet) probably measure out to about that...
(don't have one on hand presently---nor a reloading manual
in the office,and don't feel like spending 15 minutes of googlin' to find out exact)
BUT---the "bullet", the part that actually exits the business end of the barrel, is how long? Inch and three-quarter?

I reckon this post might inspire someone to fill us in on the proper details and specs.
Just think---years ago one could buy old field pieces as surplus. Small canons. Real guns. Not just "rifles".
I can't think of a single "crime" committed with old artillery pieces.

Since the 105's are becoming antiquated, give me a few of those. Do they make canister loads for 'em?
Gotta a ground squirrel problem...getting mighty tired of plinkin' at 'em with 22's.

Just think---after enough rounds, we wouldn't even have to plow!


20 posted on 01/04/2005 10:04:11 PM PST by 7MMmag (when all we peasants are disarmed, the elite won't have nobody to protect 'em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson