Skip to comments.
Gonzales Helped Set the Course for Detainees
.washingtonpost.com ^
| Wednesday, January 5, 2005
| R. Jeffrey Smith and Dan Eggen
Posted on 01/04/2005 8:17:15 PM PST by crushelits
Gonzales Had Key Role
In March 2002, U.S. elation at the capture of al Qaeda operations chief Abu Zubaida was turning to frustration as he refused to bend to CIA interrogation. But the agency's officers, determined to wring more from Abu Zubaida through threatening interrogations, worried about being charged with violating domestic and international proscriptions on torture.
They asked for a legal review -- the first ever by the government -- of how much pain and suffering a U.S. intelligence officer could inflict on a prisoner without violating a 1994 law that imposes severe penalties, including life imprisonment and execution, on convicted torturers. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel took up the task, and at least twice during the drafting, top administration officials were briefed on the results.
White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales chaired the meetings on this issue, which included detailed descriptions of interrogation techniques such as "waterboarding," a tactic intended to make detainees feel as if they are drowning. He raised no objections and, without consulting military and State Department experts in the laws of torture and war, approved an August 2002 memo that gave CIA interrogators the legal blessings they sought.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: attorney; course; detainees; doj; general; gonzales; helped; justice; set; whitehouse
To: crushelits
good for him.
don't back down Mr Gonzales. when asked these questions, don't sidestep, speak up and let the Dems have it during the televised hearings.
2
posted on
01/04/2005 8:20:16 PM PST
by
oceanview
To: crushelits
But the CIA's officers, determined to wring more from Abu Zubaida through threatening interrogations, worried about being charged with violating domestic and international proscriptions on torture.There are international proscriptions on torture?
3
posted on
01/04/2005 8:20:38 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: Texas Eagle
I think there was some kind of international guidelines that the UN or some other corrupt body tried to get contries to agree on, but I don't think the US ever signed on to follow whatever garbage they came up with.....
4
posted on
01/04/2005 8:30:28 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
To: crushelits
I just figures that the presstitutes jump right on the leftists' $hitwagon.......
5
posted on
01/04/2005 8:31:29 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
To: oceanview
Gonzales is a hero. The democrats will continue to show whos side they are on. And it's not Americas.
6
posted on
01/04/2005 8:36:23 PM PST
by
Ron in Acreage
(Kerry is (no longer) a threat to national security)
To: b4its2late
Ahhhhh. Interesting.
Did Al Qaeda sign on to it?
7
posted on
01/04/2005 8:36:54 PM PST
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: crushelits
There are some critics that want terrorist to have full american citizen rights when prosecuted in criminal courts.
It appears that they would like for the U.S. to fail in Iraq and are willing to use this Subterfuge to accomplish their aim.
8
posted on
01/04/2005 8:39:48 PM PST
by
oldbrowser
( A fine is a tax for doing wrong... A tax is a fine for doing well)
To: crushelits
At least one of the meetings during this period included a detailed description of the interrogation methods the CIA wanted to use, such as open-handed slapping, the threat of live burial and "waterboarding" -- a procedure that involves strapping a detainee to a board, raising the feet above the head, wrapping the face and nose in a wet towel, and dripping water onto the head. Tested repeatedly on U.S. military personnel as part of interrogation resistance training, the technique proved to produce an unbearable sensation of drowning. In other words, the Democrats will apparently contend that "slapping equals torture".
Interestingly, none of the "torture" techniques discussed seem to involve actual physical pain (beyond slapping, I suppose). Instead, they consist of threats and perceptions.
Not even anything "cruel and unusual" -- like panties on the head.
If it weren't for the media and their ability to distort accusations and twist testimony, the Democrats would be empty-handed and at sea on this issue.
9
posted on
01/04/2005 9:04:39 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Texas Eagle
10
posted on
01/05/2005 6:10:35 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson