[dighton]

Instead, it seems likely to do little more than call attention to Election Day voting irregularities . . .

It calls attention to barking moonbat, sore loser, crybaby freaks.

[Kozak]

Instead, it seems likely to do little more than call attention to Election Day voting irregularities . . .

Oh, like the vandalism of Republican vans for the get out the vote effort, for which a number of the spawn of local elected democrats have been charged? Or the fact that the Milwaukee voter rolls weren't purged of people registered in empty lots, none existant addresses and factories and stores? Those kind of voting irregularities that occur over and over in the Rat infested counties of our Republic.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

Go for it, Moonbats!

Let's start a Freepr fund for "Moonbats 2008"! We need to keep them Verrry busy till 2008 with recounts. We need to support their efforts in continuing "recounts interminable".

[alloysteel]

Do Democrats of ANY stripe want to open up this line of discussion? Sure, there is fraud that goes on in elections in a lot of corners of America. But any honest evaluation of the problem always comes around to one conclusion - that the vast preponderance of election fraud occurs in precincts that are ALREADY Democrat. In districts that would, in an honest tally, come up maybe 55% Democrat, there are lopsided margins of 75%, 80%, even 90+%. The outcome within these districts would not be particularly altered. But the overall vote totals for any given state as a whole may prove to be decisively AGAINST the Democrats, as in Washington State governor's race. King County/Seattle manufactured just enough votes to win, in the otherwise Democrat wards, because, after all, just about everybody there voted Democrat, who is going to catch a few more slipped in?

The outcome there was tainted, in so many ways.