Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Too Much Money For MDs To Use, As Giving Surges
NY Sun ^ | 1/4/05 | JACOB GERSHMAN

Posted on 01/04/2005 6:07:32 PM PST by wagglebee

The enormous response to relief agencies assisting victims of the Indian Ocean tsunami has led at least one disaster organization to turn off the donation spigot.

Doctors Without Borders, which has distributed emergency aid to countries battered by the December 26 tsunami, is telling donors that it has received a "sufficient" amount of money for its South Asia relief efforts and is asking them to contribute to the agency's general fund.

The organization, which has sent emergency medical teams to the hardest hit areas and has purchased and transported 200 metric tons of relief materials, has raised about $20 million for tsunami victims, according to a spokeswoman for Doctors Without Borders, Kris Torgeson.

(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aid; doctors; donations; tsunami
So why are the leftist crying about there not being enough money?
1 posted on 01/04/2005 6:07:32 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They should use some of the money to pay their liability premiums so that the trial lawyers can sue 'em.


2 posted on 01/04/2005 6:15:56 PM PST by Loyal Buckeye ((Kerry is a flake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Am I the only one that thinks that all affected (and still living) victims could end up with a brand new house (built to western standards), new roads, new schools, etc. etc. etc.?

With the amount of aid being coughed up, it would seem easier to just give each survivor 100,000 dollars (a stunning fortune in that part of the world) and call it done!

Perhaps then they could quit selling their 12year old daughters into prostitution for wealthy Euro-Trash sex tourists.

Sorry, seems my Christmas spirit has been exhausted early this year.
3 posted on 01/04/2005 6:17:20 PM PST by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It was only this one organization (Doctors without Borders) who said they have enough money. Their charter is limited - they provide medical care only. The bigger need is for food, housing, water and sewage systems, and none of the organizations who provide that say they have enough.


4 posted on 01/04/2005 6:32:05 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

That's because regionally they've NEVER had good food, housing, water and sewage systems in the FIRST PLACE!!!

I love how the story is that the aid programs are going to solve the water problems in the region. As if the water problems were because of the tsunami. The water problem is there because the countries have never spent the money necessary to solve it.


5 posted on 01/04/2005 7:31:57 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Not quite right. These areas don't usually have decomposing bodies in the water supply. And they have had housing and food - or are you arguing that people can live without those?

Granted, they don't have living standards like we do in the West, but they did have survival conditions. And they don't now.


6 posted on 01/04/2005 7:50:40 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

True.
God save those poor, decent people.
It will be very difficult to get furthor international "aid" dollars sent once the donors understand they are really sending money to rebuild the tourist areas that specialised in providing enslaved child prostitutes to international sexual perverts.
Sigh...


7 posted on 01/04/2005 8:10:35 PM PST by sarasmom (McCarthy has been vindicated. When will Carter be vilified?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Time for the UN to take over. And watch the $$$ evaporate.


8 posted on 01/04/2005 8:11:37 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: konaice

Amen to your post.


9 posted on 01/04/2005 8:14:26 PM PST by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
It will be very difficult to get furthor international "aid" dollars sent once the donors understand they are really sending money to rebuild the tourist areas that specialised in providing enslaved child prostitutes to international sexual perverts.

But we can direct our dollars to organizations that won't support the sex trade. IOW, no money to the UN. Send it to organizations like the Red Cross or CARE. Give it to the military (US, Australia, etc) who spend it on delivering water and food.

10 posted on 01/04/2005 8:31:02 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

Check out these stats from UNICEF (yes, I know it's UNICEF, but the methodology on this is still pretty valid, as are the numbers):

% with Clean Water sources* 1999/1990
Thailand 80 (71)
Indonesia 76 (69)
India 88 (78)

% with Sanitation facilities for waste**
Thailand 96 (86)
Indonesia 65 (54)
India 31 (21)

*These include house connections, public standpipes, boreholes with handpumps, protected dug wells, protected springs, rainwater collection. Tanker trucks and bottled water are not included. The data do not imply that the level of services or quality of water is adequate or safe. No discounting was made to allow for intermittence of services or quality of the water supply.

**These include connection to a sewer or septic system, pour-flush latrine, simple pit or ventilated improved pit latrine and other facilities as long as they are private or shared (but not public). Types not considered safe are bucket latrine, overhang latrine, open latrine, uncovered pit latrine or open field, ‘bush’ sanitation.

And actually, often these countries DO have decomposing bodies in the water. They just aren't usually human bodies.

I don't know what conditions are now, and I'm not saying at all that they DON'T need help and funds, but I will say that many of the organizations who are crying for money now were crying before, because the needs are not so far different from what they were before. It was ALREADY a disaster in many of these places before from a sanitation standpoint. Now the disaster is more visible and can be linked to a tsunami.


11 posted on 01/04/2005 8:44:45 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

Never send money to the Red Cross.
They "crossed over" decades ago.


12 posted on 01/04/2005 8:50:37 PM PST by sarasmom (McCarthy has been vindicated. When will Carter be vilified?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: konaice

I agree completely.


13 posted on 01/04/2005 10:44:59 PM PST by texasflower (Liberty can change habits. ~ President George W. Bush 10/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson