Posted on 01/04/2005 4:38:59 PM PST by chiller
I think that they are referring to the signature that you have to sign by your name and address when you vote. My guess is that these four hundred votes in the same handwriting are among the over five hundred votes that were cast giving the election headquarters for King County as their address. The Democrats claim that they are homeless people that they registered, despite the fact that some of the registrations give other addresses. Maybe they should just throw out all the votes of the counties that messed up and just tabulate the votes of the rest of the state.
In fact, John Funds entry in todays OpinionJournal Political Diary ($) sports a picture of Christine Gregoire and is entitled Tarnished Crown. Fund states that A handwriting analyst hired by the state's home-building industry believes there is strong evidence that one person may have signed over 300 provisional ballots cast in a controversial precinct in which hundreds of voters listed the county's administration building as their home address. Fund then goes on to say that with so much uncertainty in the election that It's time to call in both state investigators and the FBI and have a look at the anomalies in this race. He notes that the final outcome of the election might not be changed by all of this, but at least some of the myriad of unanswered questions about the vote count may be resolved.Posted by Seth Cooper at January 4, 2005 05:43 PM
For those of us in So Cal 'Forest Lawn' comes to mind.
Thank you for the reminder in #138. Yes, it is all coming back now. I remember that now but forgot. I was just happy when I saw Fund still writing for the WSJ.
Stop children what's that sound ......Everybody look what's going down
Unfreakin real, Gregoire is a piece of cow dung.
Yeah, really. :^)
Mr Flee & I voted absentee one year. We had to go to a notary to make it legal. How can they misuse an absentee ballot?
The notary required ID.
They ought to fingerprint these things, too.
?!
How many years ago was that?
Great news - let's see it in the WSJ, and it'll make waves for sure...
If this turns out to be true, I will NOT be surprised. Check this one out, Annie! I'd say the democrats have their b*tts in a sling now. ;)
Fingerprint them.
Wow. Seems like you can do an entire Jerry Springer episode on him.
The signature which is on file with the auditor's office. (You knoe, the one you give when you first register.) That's a guess.
The girl even recorded converstaions with fund that are somewhere on the net, and he still took her back, as I recall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.