To: GingisK
He can be charged as a domestic terrorist. I've noticed a trend in the news and by the talking heads in Washington to describe things that used to be crimes as terrorism. It's the new "in" thing.
51 posted on
01/04/2005 6:34:03 PM PST by
dljordan
To: dljordan
Yep. More perversion of the laws by government. Surprised = not.
To: dljordan
I've noticed a trend in the news and by the talking heads in Washington to describe things that used to be crimes as terrorism. Gee, who could have seen that one coming....?
102 posted on
01/05/2005 7:30:59 AM PST by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: dljordan; GingisK; Mad_Tom_Rackham; freeeee
He can be charged as a domestic terrorist. I've noticed a trend in the news and by the talking heads in Washington to describe things that used to be crimes as terrorism. It's the new "in" thing.
Yep. According to the Patriot Act, "domestic terrorism" can mean anything that involves "acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State." Under this definition, any crime anywhere committed by anyone can be considered an act of domestic terrorism.
And to think that some brave "patriots" here are just fine with that.
111 posted on
01/05/2005 8:17:46 AM PST by
sheltonmac
("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." -Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson