Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Electromagnetic Pulse: An Avoidable Disaster
GOPUSA ^ | January 4, 2005 | Paul M. Weyrich

Posted on 01/04/2005 12:43:49 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: RaceBannon

Damn, Race! You're really on it today!


61 posted on 01/04/2005 1:43:41 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport 'em all; let Fox sort 'em out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Policy discussions like this only serve to encourage rogue states to straw distribute nukes to non-state groups, thus muddling just who tossed it at us and our moral justification in a response. After all, it was Zarqawi who did it, not Syria. Liberals make a fuss over Abbu Ghrab and ladies underwear. More people die per capita in police custody in the United States than did prisoners of war in Iraq.

I can just hear Pelosi demanding a full investigation by the UN Security Council in identifying who really tossed a nuke at us before we "rush to war". Appearances can be deceiving she will spout off. Don't think for a second otherwise.

62 posted on 01/04/2005 1:44:46 PM PST by blackdog (May Islam meet Tennyson's "Ninth Wave" in my lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Radioactive
Underground fiber otpics......this would prevent any EMP attack from being sucessful.

Oh really? /sarcasm

63 posted on 01/04/2005 1:49:34 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

GOOGLE is your friend...


64 posted on 01/04/2005 1:49:48 PM PST by RaceBannon (((awaiting new tag line)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: G32

Assuming our guidance systems would work after an EMP attack.


65 posted on 01/04/2005 1:51:50 PM PST by Cobra64 (Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent
Roscoe Bartlett just happens to have Alliant Technologies and about twenty other EMP shelter/hardening/weapons defense companies inside his district, or very close by in Virginia. Don't think this is anything but returns on campaign contributions. At last analysis, a corporation gets a return of six hundred and twelve dollars for every dollar they spend on campaign contributions when spending more than $100,000.

Sure beats the market or securities investments.

66 posted on 01/04/2005 1:53:52 PM PST by blackdog (May Islam meet Tennyson's "Ninth Wave" in my lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
I want a simple emp device that will project a focused pulse from the rear of my car for, say, 200 feet. The cop comes up behind me and I flip the switch. I have daydreamed about such a thing since I first heard EMP can kill a cars ignition. There has got to be a way...

Have you considered bribing a Chinese electronics technician?

67 posted on 01/04/2005 1:54:05 PM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Well, liberals will fuss anyway. Let them fuss.

I could argue that our ability to minimize economic impact would be a plus all around.

However, as you further explained, I think that the enormity of trying to EMP proof the US economy would be incredible. In my opinion, a few so-called pre-emptive strikes would be cheaper and more effective.

Try to be patient with us. You obviously have thought more of this through because of your job content.


68 posted on 01/04/2005 1:56:45 PM PST by Stashiu ( Yeah, I am a Vietnam Vet, not a War Criminal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

OK...this may be a silly question...but I'd rather be informed than ignorant. What if we had a 30-60 warning of an incoming ICBM to explode over Chicago. Would electronics fry in my house if I shut off the main and would the electronics in my car be fried if I disconnected the battery cable to it. I thought that EMP damages things that have current running through it...the EM pulse would seek a power source and pummel it with "extra" protons (positive energy) thus shorting it out. Enquiring minds want to know.


69 posted on 01/04/2005 1:57:14 PM PST by BureaucratusMaximus ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
After he found that the Clinton Administration was ignoring the threat

Ignoring? He created the threat:

Clinton and his friends in China

In my search, I found another good technical article on EMP weapons:

America's Vulnerability to a Different Nuclear Threat: An Electromagnetic Pulse

70 posted on 01/04/2005 1:57:40 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

I agree that the threat's liklihood will be pumped up beyond reality, but I disagree with the idea that the threat itself isn't real. A nuclear strike on a modern US city would be completely devastating to the entire nation.


71 posted on 01/04/2005 1:59:24 PM PST by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus

30-60=30-60 minute warning...sorry.


72 posted on 01/04/2005 2:01:09 PM PST by BureaucratusMaximus ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
That or build a lead shield around your house!

It was reported that Bill Gates encased his house in stainless steel and turned it into a virtual Gaussian Sphere.

73 posted on 01/04/2005 2:01:36 PM PST by Podkayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
That or build a lead shield around your house!

Actually its not lead for above ground buildings its something else...

74 posted on 01/04/2005 2:05:48 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Radioactive
Underground fiber optics wouldn't really help us as much as you would think.

In the aftermath of a EMP what would prevent you from connecting to free republic would certainly be the lack of power from damage to our power grid. I'm not really afraid of that occurring, but fiber connecting the different communications systems would be useless without power and, more to the point, working communication systems to connect to the fiber.

As far as military communication that would probably be done with wide-band radio transmission.

-paridel
75 posted on 01/04/2005 2:11:36 PM PST by Paridel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stashiu
Wanna chew on another shoe? Consider assuring design efficacy and quality assurance on EMP hardened infrastructure. Talk about weighing the odds between charging $20,000 for a $500 transformer and fleecing the public with almost zero chance of being held accountable because someone set off a nuclear bomb for Christ's Sake?

A simple three phase 400MHZ feed thru capacitor sold to the government for EMP hardened facilities servicing aircraft sells for about $1,200 each. A common, off the shelf critter of the same performance runs about $75. I think in most cases, just replacing a few dozen at $75 a copy on an item which begins to dielectrictaly deteriorate on it's own every 10,000 hours under load is a better option in the event of an EMP than to prepare for it at a 1000% inflated cost.

You techie diehards out there may want to consider a second option........Change FCC, UL, EU, and CISPR standards to phase in all devices be manufactured to withstand EMP, including your VCR, coffee pot, and automobile so that economy of scale makes EMP affordable and implemented over the lifetime of a few cycles of consumer goods. It could be done without a national dog and pony show in the house and senate.

76 posted on 01/04/2005 2:16:04 PM PST by blackdog (May Islam meet Tennyson's "Ninth Wave" in my lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
they generate protons that fry it

I believe you mean photons, not protons ;-)

But yes, it can be turned off and still be effected.

-paridel
77 posted on 01/04/2005 2:22:39 PM PST by Paridel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Have long had a concern about this.

Interestingly, some prophetic types have "seen in the spirit" that we have a satellite which can direct something similar to any geographic area on the planet in a broad or narrow focus of resulting electronic devastation. Supposedly, we can neutralize a city or region at the push of a button at NORAD.


78 posted on 01/04/2005 2:30:47 PM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. I TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus
Short answer, yes, they could still fry. However I believe that they would be safer turned off, and disconnecting your main and removing all of the plugs from your wall, maybe dragging your computer to the basement, would probably all help.

Also if you had 30 minutes warning you could take your radio, temporarily remove its antenna, grab some extra batteries and shove everything in a metal can and that would probably be more than enough protection.

the EM pulse would seek a power source and pummel it with "extra" protons (positive energy) thus shorting it out.

Like I stated about, I think what you mean is photon, not proton?

Basically all electromagnetic energy (light, radio waves, x-rays, etc) can only exists in certain amounts. That is it is quantized. A photon is the smallest amount of electromagnetic radiation that can exist. It is possible to have 2 photons worth of EM radiation, but not 1.5.

When we are dealing with EM radiation of relatively low frequencies, such as AM or FM radio, cell phones, or broadcast TV, it is convenient to think of it as a wave. However when we get to the far end of the electromagnetic spectrum, small-wavelength and very high in frequency, such as X-rays and Gamma rays, it is more convenient to think of the EM radiation as a particle rather than a wave. This is because its behavior is more easily modeled with a particle theory.

I can certainly understand where the concept of devices not getting damaged when they are turned off comes from. Most movies (for instance the matrix) certainly depict it working in that fashion. The reason I think they would be safer is that if the EM radiation isn't enough to permanently damage the circuits it could still mess mess with a logic gate, setting something high that shouldn't be, which could possibly make the device malfunction and cause damage. That is one of the major problems with non-radiation hardened processors in space, not permanent damage to the circuits, but invalid computations because gates get flipped.

-paridel
79 posted on 01/04/2005 2:40:11 PM PST by Paridel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

What in the world could they do about it? A large percentage of those buffoons can't spell EMP. You don't even have to have a nuke blast for someone to disrupt communications with EMP. EMP generators are easy to build.


80 posted on 01/04/2005 2:42:42 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson