Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackRazor
Does it somehow make you a better ballplayer if you do play in the field, but are a below average fielder? Does that help the team more than a good DH?

The point is that a baseball player fields, throws, and hits. (With the pitchers getting an excception). If a guy is a great fielder, and nothing else, he won't get in. If a guy is a great hitter and a poor fielder, he can get in. But, if a guy is so bad in the field that he can't even play in the field, then that ought to count for something.

84 posted on 01/04/2005 12:55:09 PM PST by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: Rodney King
The point is that a baseball player fields, throws, and hits. (With the pitchers getting an excception). If a guy is a great fielder, and nothing else, he won't get in. If a guy is a great hitter and a poor fielder, he can get in. But, if a guy is so bad in the field that he can't even play in the field, then that ought to count for something.

Do you take the same limiting view with respect to relief pitchers making the Hall of Fame? Like the DH, the closer is a specialized role that has developed in baseball's modern era. If it's an integral part of the game that these positions exist today, then shouldn't the best of them be acknowledged?

92 posted on 01/04/2005 1:03:06 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson