Posted on 01/04/2005 11:42:36 AM PST by IndyTiger
Wade Boggs was overwhelmingly elected to the Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility Tuesday, and Ryne Sandberg made it with just six votes to spare on his third try.
Boggs, a five-time American League batting champion for the Boston Red Sox (news), was selected by 474 of the record 516 voters who are 10-year members of the Baseball Writers' Association of America.
The 91.86 percent of ballots he received was the 19th-highest percentage in Hall history, and he became the 41st player elected on his first chance.
Sandberg, the 1984 National League MVP for the Chicago Cubs (news), was picked by 393 voters. He appeared on 76.2 percent of ballots, just above the 75 percent cutoff (387). Sandberg received 49.2 percent of votes in 2003 and got 61.1 percent last year, falling 71 votes short.
Results of voting by the Veterans Committee will be released March 2. Gil Hodges, Tony Oliva and Ron Santo were among the 25 candidates on that ballot.
(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...
You keep your prayers for those kids...
I am out of there now. They need them more than I do....
Either way, both Ozzie and Cal have acquitted themselves very well outside of the game....
His wife has a business here too so relocation was out of the question, but he still does some color work for ESPN when he is free. I can see him back in pro baseball though in a few years, would probably make a great batting coach. Opposing players used to come to him for advice and tips on hitting. He was one of the first to use video, now it is common practice.
yeah he made hitting into a profession....
its really amazing he didnt go to the AL to be a DH...
he would be breaking Pete Rose's record about now.....
Speaking of San Diego baseball, I hope Jerry Coleman makes it into the broadcasters wing this year. 32 years on the radio, not to mention his years with the Yankees and also serving as a fighter pilot in WWII and Korea.
Oh, I don't disagree with that. The crux of my argument is that I think there are many HOF players who are enshrined largely due to their offensive contributions, who were not good enough defensively to have any positive impact to their team in that aspect of the game. Just playing the field shouldn't give you bonus points if you weren't particularly good there. On that basis, I think there's a bit of a double standard, or perhaps ignorance, with regards to the contributions of a DH in comparison. Someone else brought up Manny Ramirez. Great offensive player. Perhaps HOF worthy. But he's atrocious defensively. He hurts the team more than a DH who doesn't play the field. But that doesn't seem to figure into the HOF equation with position players who put up the offensive numbers.
And there's something of a double standard with regards to defense, too. Take Keith Hernandez. Well above average offensively. Arguably the best fielding first basemen ever. But his detractors will say that first base is not important enough of a defensive position for his defensive ability to put him over the top and into the HOF. Well, if some defensive positions aren't important enough, then why are we holding that against the DH's, most of whom would be playing the unimportant position of first base anyway!
If you want to play that game, Ted Williams had more homers than Ernie Banks and had 1700 fewer at bats. By your reasoning then, Banks shouldn't be in the Hall either.
Like it or not, Sandberg was one of the best at his position at batting and fielding. That is why he went to the Hall of Fame. If you deny Sandberg, you must also deny Joe Morgan.
If Sandberg gets you frosted up, take a look at Bill Mazeroski's numbers.
Ted didn't play infield. ;)
In any case, even if we stipulate that Williams was a better hitter than Banks - who can deny it? - it's also pretty clear that Ryno was nowhere near the hitter that Banks was. It's all about where you draw the line - if Williams > Banks > Sandberg, where should we draw the line for Hall of Famers? Personally, despite his fielding ability, I think Banks is clearly in, and Ryno's right on the cusp. You're of the opinion that Sandberg is clearly and obviously good enough, and I think he's kind of marginal. That's what's great about this country - I can have my opinion, and you can have yours, no matter how wrong you are ;)
Well, yeah, and when the DH has also been around for eighty years or so, that stigma may be somewhat less too ;)
Yeah, good point. I just don't want to ever get to the point where the Don Baylor's, Steve Balboni's, and Greg Luzniskis are up for the HOF because of their DH'ing.
Yes but Johnson was a manager.
When you get around to looking up the stats of other Hall of Fame 2nd baseman, I will leave you with this. Even Babe Ruth didn't have a unanimous vote into the Hall either. BTW, how old are you? : )
You do realize that Sandberg was a #2 hitter through-out his career. If you are going to talk about RBI's (a woefully insufficient measure of a player's offensive contribution), you might as well also mention runs scored, especially since Ryno was a top of the order hitter. And in that category, he topped 100 runs scored seven times. And funny you mention 1990 as a juiceball year (it wasn't), Sandberg's 40 home runs led the league.
Harold Baines will be the really interesting case. A DH most of his career, he has put up some outstanding career hitting numbers but did very little else worthy of Hall consideration. Not counting Pete Rose and players certain to be inducted when they are eligible (like Boggs and Gwynn), Baines will have more career hits than any player not a certainty to get into the Hall.
With the logjam in 2007, I wouldn't go by the votes he gets in the first year but 2008 and 2009 will say a lot for Baines' HOF prospects which will also give some indication to how the voters will feel about Edgar Martinez who is roughly in the same situation.
I seem to recall he batted third in '85 and '86, but if you want to look at him batting second, we can talk about his less-than-godlike career OBP of .344. Hornsby, by comparison, had a career OBP of .507. And any year where Sandberg can hit 40 home runs, and then 26 the year after, is juiced, practically by definition.
All time at 2b, I rate Sandberg behind Hornsby, Collins, Morgan, maybe Lajoie and Gehringer, but ahead of everyone else.
Now if one of the five or ten best 3b--Ron Santo--makes it in via the Veterans Committee, I think it will be time for my first trip to visit Cooperstown this summer.
Then Bruce Sutter and Lee Smith get voted in next year.
Player Votes %
Wade Boggs 474 91.9%
Ryne Sandberg 393 76.2%
Bruce Sutter 344 66.7%
Jim Rice 307 59.5%
"Goose" Gossage 285 55.2%
Andre Dawson 270 52.3%
Bert Blyleven 211 40.9%
Lee Smith 200 38.8%
Jack Morris 172 33.3%
Tommy John 123 23.8%
Steve Garvey 106 20.5%
Alan Trammell 87 16.9%
Dave Parker 65 12.6%
Don Mattingly 59 11.4%
Dave Concepcion 55 10.7%
Dale Murphy 54 10.5%
Willie McGee 26 5.0%
Jim Abbott 13 2.5%
Darryl Strawberry 6 1.2%
Jack McDowell 4 0.8%
Chili Davis 3 0.6%
Tom Candiotti 2 0.4%
Jeff Montgomery 2 0.4%
Tony Phillips 1 0.2%
Terry Steinbach 1 0.2%
Mark Langston 0 0.0%
Otis Nixon 0 0.0%
Sandberg was a class act. As a Mets fan, I always appreciated his play.
None of these guys is Hall worthy.
Ripken, McGwire, and Gwynn are all worthy. Ripken is the second-best SS of all time (behind Wagner).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.